Looking for your next perfect pair of running shoes? You’ve probably come across the Hoka Speedgoat 6 and Asics Gel Kayano 31 – two powerhouses in the running world, but with very different specialties.
The trail-conquering Speedgoat 6 and the road-warrior Kayano 31 each bring unique technologies and features to the table. Let’s break down these popular shoes to help you make the right choice for your running needs.
Key Takeaways:
- The Hoka Speedgoat 6 is specifically designed for trail running with its Vibram® Megagrip outsole and 5mm lugs, while the Asics Gel Kayano 31 excels on roads with its adaptive stability system. They each perform best in their intended environments and shouldn’t be used interchangeably.
- For plantar fasciitis and stability needs, the Kayano 31 is the clear winner thanks to its 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™ and maximum cushioning. Its design specifically supports both neutral runners and overpronators, making it more versatile for different foot types.
- The Speedgoat 6 ($155) is slightly more affordable than the Kayano 31 ($165), but both shoes justify their premium price points through their specialized technologies and durability. Your choice should primarily depend on where you’ll be running rather than the price difference.
- For all-day standing and urban walking, the Kayano 31 provides better comfort with its FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO cushioning and road-specific design. The Speedgoat’s aggressive trail features can feel awkward on flat, hard surfaces.
- Both shoes offer true-to-size fitting but have different approaches – the Speedgoat 6 provides a secure trail fit with a roomy toe box, while the Kayano 31 offers an adaptive fit that accommodates foot swelling during long runs and works well for multiple foot types.
Quick Comparison Table:
| Feature | Hoka Speedgoat 6 | Asics Gel Kayano 31 |
|---|---|---|
| Stability | Neutral | Stability + Neutral Support |
| Flexibility | Moderate | High |
| Sizing | True to size with roomy toe box | True to size with adaptive fit |
| Weight | 9.80 oz | 10.7 oz |
| Cushion | Balanced responsive cushioning | Maximum cushioning |
| Outsole | Vibram® Megagrip with 5mm lugs | Hybrid ASICSGRIP™ |
| Midsole | Light responsive compound | FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO with PureGEL™ |
| Upper | Lightweight woven textile | Engineered mesh |
| Retail Price | $155 | $165 |
Features Comparison:
Material:
The Speedgoat 6 features a durable Vibram® Megagrip outsole with aggressive 5mm lugs, perfect for technical trails. Its lightweight woven upper provides excellent breathability while maintaining durability.
In contrast, the Kayano 31 utilizes Hybrid ASICSGRIP™ outsole technology for road grip, with an engineered mesh upper that adapts to foot movement. The FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO midsole in the Kayano shows Asics’ commitment to sustainability, using 20% bio-based content.
Durability:
The Speedgoat 6’s trail-focused design includes a protective toe bumper and reinforced high-wear areas, making it extremely durable on rough terrain. Its Vibram® outsole shows minimal wear even after heavy trail use.
The Kayano 31 demonstrates excellent durability on roads, with its ASICSGRIP™ outsole maintaining integrity over many miles. Both shoes’ uppers show good resistance to wear, though the Speedgoat’s trail-specific construction gives it an edge in harsh conditions.
Fit:
The Speedgoat 6 offers a secure fit with its internal support chassis and dual-sided gusseted tongue, preventing foot movement on technical terrain. The dynamic vamp provides extra room in the forefoot.
The Kayano 31 excels with its adaptive fit system, accommodating both neutral and overpronating feet. The engineered mesh upper creates a sock-like fit that molds to your foot shape over time.
Cushioning:
Hoka’s balanced cushioning in the Speedgoat 6 provides protection while maintaining ground feel and responsiveness – crucial for trail running.
The Kayano 31 takes a different approach with its maximum cushioning setup, combining FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO foam and PureGEL™ technology. This creates an incredibly plush ride that excels during long road runs, though it may feel too soft for some runners.
Stability:
The Speedgoat 6 offers neutral stability with a symmetrical cushion bed, focusing on natural foot movement and ground adaptation. Its 5mm drop promotes a more natural stride.
The Kayano 31 shines with its 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™, providing adaptive stability that works for both neutral runners and overpronators. The 10mm drop and structured support make it excellent for runners needing extra stability.
Value for Money:
At $155, the Speedgoat 6 represents solid value for a technical trail shoe with premium features like Vibram® outsole and protective elements. The Kayano 31’s $165 price tag reflects its advanced technology and versatile support system.
Both shoes justify their price points through durability and performance, though your value assessment should depend on your primary running surface.
Performance Testing:
Walking Performance:
The Kayano 31 excels in walking comfort with its plush FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO cushioning and adaptable support system. The flat outsole pattern and road-specific design make it ideal for urban environments.
The Speedgoat 6, while comfortable, may feel overbuilt for casual walking with its aggressive lugs. However, it’s an excellent walking shoe for trail and outdoor activities.
Running Performance:
The Speedgoat 6 dominates trail running with its responsive cushioning and exceptional grip. The 5mm lugs and protective features inspire confidence on technical terrain.
The Kayano 31 shines on roads, especially for longer distances. Its adaptive stability and maximum cushioning help prevent fatigue during extended runs. Each shoe excels in its intended environment but may feel compromised when used on the wrong surface.
Standing All Day:
For all-day standing, the Kayano 31 takes the lead with its maximum cushioning and adaptive support. The PureGEL™ technology and eco-friendly midsole provide consistent comfort throughout the day.
The Speedgoat 6’s trail-focused design, while comfortable, may feel unnecessary for indoor use. Its aggressive outsole might also feel awkward on hard, flat surfaces.
Plantar Fasciitis Support:
The Kayano 31’s structured support and 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™ make it an excellent choice for plantar fasciitis sufferers. The combination of cushioning and stability helps reduce stress on the plantar fascia.
The Speedgoat 6 offers good protection but lacks the specific support features that make the Kayano 31 superior for this condition.
Conclusion: Which Is Better For You?
Your choice between these shoes should primarily depend on your running environment and support needs. Choose the Speedgoat 6 if you’re primarily hitting trails and need excellent grip and protection with responsive cushioning.
Opt for the Kayano 31 if you’re a road runner, especially if you need stability support or deal with plantar fasciitis. Both shoes excel in their intended uses but aren’t ideal crossover options.