Lace up and get ready for an exhilarating showdown between two titans of the running world! The Hoka Clifton 9 and Saucony Ride 17 are vying for the top spot in your shoe rotation. Both promise comfort and performance, but which one truly delivers?
Whether you’re a seasoned marathoner or a casual jogger, this in-depth comparison will help you find your perfect match. Let’s dive in and discover which shoe will propel you to new heights!
key takeaways:
- The Hoka Clifton 9 offers plush cushioning and a lightweight design, making it ideal for long, easy runs and all-day comfort. It features a unique Early Stage Meta-Rocker for smooth transitions.
- The Saucony Ride 17 introduces PWRRUN+ foam, providing a balance of softness and responsiveness. It’s versatile enough for various paces and distances, from warm-ups to uptempo runs.
- Both shoes are neutral and offer different stability experiences. The Clifton 9 has a higher stack height, while the Ride 17 provides stability through its overall design and increased outsole coverage.
- For walking and standing all day, both shoes excel but in different ways. The Clifton 9 offers maximum cushioning, while the Ride 17 provides a more responsive feel.
- When it comes to value, the Ride 17 is slightly cheaper and offers new technology, while the Clifton 9 provides a wider range of sizes and widths. The choice ultimately depends on individual preferences and needs.
Comparison Table between Hoka Clifton 9 And Saucony Ride 17:
| Feature | Hoka Clifton 9 | Saucony Ride 17 |
|---|---|---|
| Launched In | 2023 | 2024 |
| Stability | Neutral | Neutral |
| Flexibility | Moderate | Moderate to High |
| Sizing | True to size | True to size |
| Weight | 8.70 oz (Men’s) | 9.9 oz (Men’s) |
| Cushion | Plush | Soft and Springy |
| Outsole | Durabrasion rubber | Increased coverage |
| Midsole | Compression molded EVA foam | PWRRUN+ foam |
| Upper | Engineered knit | Engineered mesh |
| Retail Price | $145.00 | $140.00 |
Hoka Clifton 9 vs Saucony Ride 17: Features Comparision
1. Materials
When it comes to materials, both shoes bring their A-game. The Hoka Clifton 9 features a Durabrasion rubber outsole designed for longevity and grip. Its compression molded EVA foam midsole provides a balance of cushioning and responsiveness. The upper is crafted from breathable engineered knit, offering a snug, comfortable fit.
The Saucony Ride 17, on the other hand, boasts an increased outsole coverage for enhanced protection and durability. Its midsole utilizes PWRRUN+ foam, Saucony’s softest-feeling and most responsive cushioning to date. The upper is constructed with engineered mesh, prioritizing breathability and comfort.
Both shoes incorporate recycled materials, with the Clifton 9 using recycled content in its laces and the Ride 17 featuring unspecified recycled materials throughout.
2. Durability
Durability is a key factor for any running shoe, and both models have been designed with longevity in mind. The Hoka Clifton 9’s Durabrasion rubber outsole is engineered to withstand the wear and tear of daily runs, offering excellent traction and resilience against abrasion.
The Saucony Ride 17 steps up its game with increased outsole coverage, which not only enhances protection but also contributes to the shoe’s overall durability. This design choice suggests that the Ride 17 might have a slight edge in terms of long-term wear, especially for runners who tend to be harder on their shoes.
Both models use high-quality materials in their construction, which should translate to good durability overall. However, individual wear patterns and running surfaces will ultimately influence how long each shoe lasts.
3. Fit
Fit is crucial for comfort and performance, and both shoes aim to provide an optimal experience. The Hoka Clifton 9 features a gusseted tongue that helps prevent tongue migration and ensures a secure fit. Its engineered knit upper is designed to hug the foot comfortably, adapting to different foot shapes.
The Saucony Ride 17 has focused on enhancing its fit based on user feedback from the previous model. The engineered mesh upper is crafted to provide a comfortable, yet performance-oriented fit. It’s worth noting that Saucony specifically mentions an “enhanced fit” as one of the improvements in this version.
Both shoes are reported to run true to size, but the Clifton 9 offers a wider range of sizes and widths, potentially making it more accessible for runners with varying foot shapes.
4. Cushioning
Cushioning is where these shoes really start to differentiate themselves. The Hoka Clifton 9 is known for its plush cushioning, featuring a compression molded EVA foam midsole.
This provides a soft, comfortable ride that Hoka fans have come to love. The Clifton 9 also boasts increased stack height compared to its predecessor, offering even more cushioning underfoot.
The Saucony Ride 17 introduces the PWRRUN+ foam, which is described as the brand’s softest-feeling foam that’s both plush and springy. This new cushioning system aims to provide a balance of comfort and energy return, potentially offering a more responsive ride compared to the Clifton 9.
Both shoes are designed for everyday runs, but the difference in their cushioning systems might appeal to different types of runners. The Clifton 9 might be preferred by those seeking maximum impact absorption, while the Ride 17 could attract runners looking for a balance of cushioning and responsiveness.
5. Stability
In terms of stability, both the Hoka Clifton 9 and Saucony Ride 17 are classified as neutral running shoes. This means they don’t have additional supportive features for overpronators and are best suited for runners with neutral foot mechanics or those who prefer a natural feel.
The Hoka Clifton 9 features a symmetrical bed of cushion without additional prescriptive technologies. It’s designed to provide support without forcing the foot into a particular position. The shoe’s Early Stage Meta-Rocker technology promotes a smooth heel-to-toe transition, which can contribute to overall stability during the gait cycle.
The Saucony Ride 17, while also a neutral shoe, doesn’t specify any particular stability features. Its stability likely comes from the overall design and fit of the shoe, including the increased outsole coverage which could provide a more stable base.
It’s important to note that while both shoes are neutral, the higher stack height of the Clifton 9 might provide a different stability experience compared to the lower profile of the Ride 17.
6. Value For Money
When considering value for money, we need to look at the price point, features, and potential longevity of each shoe. The Hoka Clifton 9 retails for $145, while the Saucony Ride 17 comes in slightly cheaper at $140.
The Clifton 9 offers Hoka’s signature plush cushioning, a durable outsole, and a comfortable upper. It also provides a wider range of sizes and widths, which could be valuable for runners with specific fit needs.
The Ride 17, while $5 cheaper, introduces Saucony’s new PWRRUN+ foam, promising a soft yet responsive ride. It also features increased outsole coverage, which could translate to better durability.
Both shoes incorporate recycled materials, adding an eco-friendly aspect to their value proposition. The choice between the two may come down to personal preferences in terms of cushioning style and brand loyalty.
Hoka Clifton 9 vs Saucony Ride 17: Performance Testing
1. For Walking
When it comes to walking, both shoes offer comfortable options, but with distinct feels. The Hoka Clifton 9, with its plush cushioning and Early Stage Meta-Rocker, provides a smooth and comfortable walking experience.
The rocker geometry can help promote a natural walking gait, potentially reducing fatigue during long walks. The lightweight nature of the Clifton 9 (8.70 oz for men) is a bonus for those who plan to spend hours on their feet.
The Saucony Ride 17, while slightly heavier (9.9 oz for men), offers a different kind of comfort with its PWRRUN+ foam. This soft yet springy cushioning could provide a more responsive feel with each step, which some walkers might prefer. The increased outsole coverage of the Ride 17 could also offer better traction on various surfaces.
2. For Running
Both shoes shine in their intended purpose: running. The Hoka Clifton 9, designed for everyday runs, excels in providing a cushioned and protective ride. Its lightweight design and Early Stage Meta-Rocker promote efficient running mechanics, potentially reducing fatigue during longer runs. The plush cushioning is particularly beneficial for runners who prioritize impact absorption over ground feel.
The Saucony Ride 17, marketed as versatile from warm-up to uptempo runs, offers a different running experience. The PWRRUN+ foam provides a balance of softness and responsiveness, which could be advantageous for runners who like to vary their pace. The slightly firmer feel compared to the Clifton 9 might offer better energy return, potentially benefiting runners during speed work or races.
3. For Standing All Day
For those who spend long hours on their feet, both shoes offer commendable comfort, but in different ways. The Hoka Clifton 9’s ample cushioning and compression molded EVA foam midsole provide excellent shock absorption, which can be a godsend for all-day standing. The Meta-Rocker geometry might also help in reducing pressure points by promoting a more even weight distribution.
The Saucony Ride 17, with its PWRRUN+ foam, offers a plush yet responsive platform for standing. The softer cushioning could provide immediate comfort, while the springy nature of the foam might help in maintaining energy levels throughout the day. The increased outsole coverage could also contribute to better stability during prolonged standing.
4. For Plantar Fasciitis
For runners dealing with plantar fasciitis, cushioning and support are crucial factors. The Hoka Clifton 9, with its generous cushioning and Early Stage Meta-Rocker, could be beneficial in reducing strain on the plantar fascia. The rocker geometry promotes a smoother toe-off, potentially alleviating some of the stress on the affected area.
The Saucony Ride 17, while also well-cushioned, offers a different approach. The PWRRUN+ foam provides a soft landing with each step, which could help in absorbing impact.
However, the more responsive nature of the cushioning might require some adjustment for those with sensitive feet. The neutral support of both shoes means that runners with plantar fasciitis should consider their individual needs and possibly consult with a professional.
Conclusion: Which Is Better For You
Choosing between the Hoka Clifton 9 and Saucony Ride 17 ultimately comes down to your personal preferences and running style. If you prioritize maximum cushioning and a lightweight feel, the Clifton 9 might be your go-to. Its plush ride and rocker geometry make it ideal for long, easy runs and all-day comfort.
On the other hand, if you’re after a versatile shoe that balances softness with responsiveness, the Ride 17 could be your perfect match. Its PWRRUN+ foam and increased durability make it suitable for various running paces and distances. Consider your running goals, foot shape, and comfort preferences to make the best choice for your needs.