Hoka Clifton 9 vs Hoka Rincon 4: What Should I Buy?

Lace up and get ready for an epic showdown between two of HOKA’s most popular running shoes! The Clifton 9 and Rincon 4 are both designed for everyday miles, but which one will cross the finish line first in your heart?

We’re diving deep into cushioning, fit, and performance to help you choose your perfect running companion. Whether you’re a seasoned marathoner or just starting your fitness journey, this comparison will have you itching to hit the pavement!

key takeaways:

  1. The Clifton 9 offers maximum cushioning and all-day comfort, making it ideal for easy runs, long walks, and those with foot pain. It’s slightly heavier but provides a plush, stable ride.
  2. The Rincon 4 is a lighter, more versatile option that balances cushioning and responsiveness. It’s suitable for a wider range of running speeds and distances, from easy jogs to tempo runs.
  3. For durability, the Clifton 9 has an edge with its Durabrasion rubber outsole, while the Rincon 4 may show wear more quickly but offers improved longevity over previous versions.
  4. The Clifton 9 excels in all-day standing comfort and may be better for plantar fasciitis sufferers due to its generous cushioning and stability.
  5. Price-wise, the Rincon 4 is $20 cheaper, offering great value for a lightweight, versatile shoe, while the Clifton 9’s higher price may be justified by its durability and cushioning.

Comparison Table between Clifton 9 And Rincon 4:

FeatureClifton 9Rincon 4
Launched In20232024
StabilityNeutralNeutral
FlexibilityModerateHigh
SizingTrue to sizeTrue to size
Weight8.70 oz8.04 oz
CushionBalanced to PlushBalanced
Out SoleDurabrasion rubberExposed foam with strategic rubber
Mid SoleCompression molded EVA foamUpgraded injected EVA
Upper SoleEngineered knitEngineered double jacquard
Retail Price$145$125

Clifton 9 VS Rincon 4: FEATURES COMPARISON

1) MATERIAL

When it comes to materials, both shoes showcase HOKA’s commitment to performance and comfort. The Clifton 9 features a breathable engineered knit upper that hugs your foot like a second skin. Its Durabrasion rubber outsole provides excellent traction and durability, while the compression molded EVA foam midsole offers that signature HOKA cushioning.

HOKA CLIFTON 9
CLIFTON 9

HOKA RINCON 4
RINCON 4

The Rincon 4, on the other hand, boasts an engineered double jacquard upper that’s both lightweight and stylish. Its outsole uses exposed foam with strategic rubber placement to save weight without sacrificing grip. The midsole is where the Rincon 4 really shines, with an upgraded injected EVA foam that promises to maintain its cushioning properties longer than its predecessor.

2) Durability

In the durability department, the Clifton 9 has a slight edge. Its Durabrasion rubber outsole covers more of the shoe’s bottom, providing better protection against wear and tear. The engineered knit upper is also known for its resilience, maintaining its shape and support even after many miles.

The Rincon 4, while lighter, may show signs of wear more quickly due to its exposed foam outsole. However, HOKA has made improvements to increase its longevity compared to earlier versions. The upgraded midsole foam is designed to resist compression and maintain its cushioning properties for longer, potentially offsetting some durability concerns.

3) Fit

Both shoes offer a comfortable fit, but there are some key differences. The Clifton 9 features a gusseted tongue that helps prevent slippage and provides a more secure midfoot feel. Its engineered knit upper adapts well to different foot shapes, offering a balance of structure and flexibility.

HOKA CLIFTON 9 TOP VIEW
CLIFTON 9 TOP VIEW

HOKA RINCON 4 TOP VIEW
RINCON 4 TOP VIEW

The Rincon 4 has a slightly roomier fit, especially in the toe box. Its padded tongue adds comfort, but some runners might find it less secure than the Clifton 9’s gusseted design. The double jacquard upper provides a good balance of breathability and support, though it may not hug the foot as closely as the Clifton’s knit material.

4) Cushioning

HOKA is known for its plush cushioning, and both shoes deliver on this front. The Clifton 9 offers a more traditional HOKA feel with its thick, soft midsole. It’s designed to provide protective cushioning while maintaining a responsive toe-off. The added 3mm of stack height compared to its predecessor makes for an even more cushioned ride.

The Rincon 4, while still well-cushioned, offers a slightly firmer and more responsive feel. Its two-layer midsole and increased stack height provide ample protection from impact, but the overall sensation is a bit less plush than the Clifton 9. This makes the Rincon 4 potentially better suited for faster-paced runs where you want more ground feel.

5) Stability

Both the Clifton 9 and Rincon 4 are classified as neutral shoes, meaning they don’t have additional support features for overpronators. However, they approach stability differently. The Clifton 9 relies on its wider base and substantial midsole to provide inherent stability. Its Early Stage Meta-Rocker design helps guide the foot through a smooth transition from heel to toe.

The Rincon 4 incorporates a rear foot-focused Active Foot Frame™, which allows your foot to sit deeper in the midsole, providing a more stable platform. Its Smooth Meta-Rocker™ design also aids in promoting an efficient gait cycle. Despite being lighter, some runners might find the Rincon 4 feels slightly more stable due to this foot-cradling design.

6) Value For Money

When considering value, it’s important to look at both initial cost and long-term performance. The Clifton 9, priced at $145, is $20 more expensive than the $125 Rincon 4. However, its potentially greater durability might make it a better long-term investment for some runners.

The Rincon 4 offers exceptional value for those seeking a lightweight, versatile shoe at a more budget-friendly price point. Its improved durability over previous versions makes it a more attractive option for budget-conscious runners who don’t want to compromise on performance.

Ultimately, both shoes offer good value, but your personal priorities (cushioning, weight, durability) will determine which provides the best bang for your buck.

Clifton 9 VS Rincon 4: Performance Testing

1) For Walking

When it comes to walking, both shoes offer comfortable options, but with different feels. The Clifton 9 shines here with its plush cushioning and Early Stage Meta-Rocker design.

This combination creates a smooth, almost effortless walking experience that many find reduces fatigue during long walks or all-day wear. The shoe’s wider base also provides excellent stability, which can be particularly beneficial for those who spend a lot of time on their feet.

The Rincon 4, while still comfortable for walking, offers a slightly firmer ride. Its lighter weight might be appreciated during longer walks, and the Smooth Meta-Rocker design still promotes an efficient stride.

However, some walkers might find it lacks the pillow-like comfort of the Clifton 9, especially for extended periods. The Rincon 4 could be preferable for those who like a more responsive feel underfoot, even when walking.

2) For Running

Both shoes excel in running, but they cater to slightly different preferences. The Clifton 9 is a dream for those who prioritize cushioning in their runs. Its plush midsole absorbs impact beautifully, making it ideal for long, easy-paced runs or recovery days. The Early Stage Meta-Rocker helps maintain efficiency, even with the softer cushioning. However, some runners might find it a bit too soft for speed work or race days.

The Rincon 4 strikes a remarkable balance between cushioning and responsiveness, making it a more versatile running shoe. Its lighter weight (8.04 oz compared to the Clifton 9’s 8.70 oz) is noticeable during faster-paced runs or longer distances.

The upgraded injected EVA midsole provides enough cushioning for comfort, while still allowing for a more connected feel with the ground. This makes the Rincon 4 suitable for a wider range of running speeds and distances, from easy jogs to tempo runs.

3) For Standing All Day

For those who spend long hours on their feet, cushioning and support become crucial factors. The Clifton 9 takes the lead in this category with its generous cushioning and stable platform.

The thick, soft midsole acts like an all-day shock absorber, potentially reducing fatigue in the feet and legs. The shoe’s wider base also contributes to better stability during prolonged standing.

The Rincon 4, while still comfortable, might not provide the same level of all-day comfort for everyone. Its lighter, more responsive cushioning could be preferred by some, especially those who alternate between standing and walking frequently.

The rear foot-focused Active Foot Frame™ does offer good support, cradling the foot and potentially reducing fatigue. However, for pure standing comfort, many users might lean towards the plusher feel of the Clifton 9.

4) For Plantar Fasciitis

When dealing with plantar fasciitis, proper support and cushioning are essential. The Clifton 9’s generous cushioning and Early Stage Meta-Rocker design could be beneficial for many sufferers.

The thick, soft midsole helps absorb shock, potentially reducing stress on the plantar fascia. The rocker design promotes a smoother heel-to-toe transition, which can help alleviate pressure on the affected area.

The Rincon 4, while still supportive, might be a hit-or-miss for plantar fasciitis sufferers. Its lighter cushioning and more responsive feel could be comfortable for some, especially those who find overly soft shoes problematic.

The Smooth Meta-Rocker design still aids in promoting an efficient stride, which can be helpful. However, those needing maximum cushioning and support might find the Clifton 9 more suitable for managing their plantar fasciitis symptoms.

Conclusion: Which Is Better For You

Choosing between the Clifton 9 and Rincon 4 ultimately comes down to your specific needs and preferences. If you prioritize maximum cushioning, all-day comfort, and don’t mind a slightly heavier shoe, the Clifton 9 is your go-to. It’s ideal for easy runs, long walks, and those dealing with foot pain.

On the other hand, if you’re after a more versatile, lightweight option that can handle both easy jogs and faster-paced runs, the Rincon 4 is an excellent choice. It offers a nice balance of cushioning and responsiveness at a lower price point.

Consider your running goals, comfort preferences, and budget to make the best decision for your feet. Remember, the best shoe is the one that feels right when you put it on and run!

Leave a Comment