Are you on the hunt for the perfect running shoe that balances comfort, performance, and style? Look no further! We’re diving deep into a head-to-head comparison of two popular contenders: the Hoka Clifton 9 and the Brooks Revel 7.
Whether you’re a seasoned runner or just starting your fitness journey, this breakdown will help you make an informed decision. Let’s lace up and explore what makes these shoes stand out!
key takeaways:
- The Hoka Clifton 9 offers superior cushioning and is ideal for long-distance running, while the Brooks Revel 7 provides a more traditional, responsive feel suitable for various distances.
- Hoka Clifton 9 is pricier at $145 but offers advanced features, whereas the Brooks Revel 7 provides excellent value at $100 for budget-conscious runners.
- Both shoes are neutral but offer stability differently: Clifton 9 uses a symmetrical cushion bed, while Revel 7 relies on its adaptive midsole for support.
- The Clifton 9 excels in all-day comfort and may be better for conditions like plantar fasciitis, while the Revel 7 offers a more grounded feel for everyday use.
- Choose the Clifton 9 for maximum cushioning and long-distance comfort, or opt for the Revel 7 if you prefer a traditional running feel with good versatility at a lower price point.
Comparison Table between Hoka Clifton 9 And Brooks Revel 7:
| Feature | Hoka Clifton 9 | Brooks Revel 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Launched In | 2023 | 2023 |
| Stability | Neutral | Neutral |
| Flexibility | Moderate | Good |
| Sizing | True to size | True to size |
| Weight | 8.7 oz (247g) | 9.1 oz (258g) |
| Cushion | Plush | Standard |
| Outsole | Durabrasion rubber | Rubber |
| Midsole | Compression molded EVA foam | BioMoGo DNA |
| Upper | Engineered knit | Engineered mesh |
| Retail Price | $145.00 | $100.00 |
Hoka Clifton 9 vs Brooks Revel 7: FEATURES COMPARISON
1) Materials: Outsole, Insole, Upper Sole
The Hoka Clifton 9 boasts a Durabrasion rubber outsole, designed to extend the shoe’s longevity and provide excellent traction on various surfaces. Its insole is plush and comfortable, while the engineered knit upper offers a breathable and foot-hugging fit. The compression molded EVA foam midsole provides lightweight cushioning that Hoka is known for.
On the other hand, the Brooks Revel 7 features a durable rubber outsole that grips well on road surfaces. The insole is comfortable and supportive, complementing the BioMoGo DNA midsole technology. The upper is constructed with an engineered mesh that provides a soft, adaptable fit while maintaining good breathability.
2) Durability
When it comes to durability, both shoes hold their ground. The Hoka Clifton 9’s Durabrasion rubber outsole is specifically engineered for longevity, making it a great choice for high-mileage runners. The knit upper is also designed to withstand regular use without losing its shape or support.
The Brooks Revel 7, while not explicitly marketed for extreme durability, is built to last. Its rubber outsole can handle consistent road running, and the engineered mesh upper maintains its integrity over time. However, for runners putting in very high mileage, the Clifton 9 might have a slight edge in long-term durability.
3) Fit
Fit is crucial in a running shoe, and both models excel in this area. The Hoka Clifton 9 offers a gusseted tongue that prevents migration during runs, ensuring a secure fit. The engineered knit upper adapts to your foot shape, providing a snug yet comfortable feel. It’s available in multiple widths, catering to different foot shapes.
The Brooks Revel 7 prides itself on its comfortable fit. The updated soft fit in this version enhances the overall comfort. The engineered mesh upper is designed to be adaptable, conforming to your foot’s shape and movement. While it may not offer as many width options as the Clifton 9, many users find its standard width accommodating for various foot types.
4) Cushioning
Cushioning is where these shoes start to diverge significantly. The Hoka Clifton 9 is renowned for its plush cushioning. It features a compression molded EVA foam midsole that provides exceptional shock absorption and comfort. With an increased stack height compared to its predecessor, the Clifton 9 offers even more cushioning without adding weight – a remarkable feat in shoe engineering.
The Brooks Revel 7, while comfortable, offers a more standard level of cushioning. Its BioMoGo DNA midsole adapts to your stride, weight, and speed, providing a personalized cushioning experience. While not as plush as the Clifton 9, it offers a good balance of comfort and responsiveness, which some runners might prefer for a more connected feel to the ground.
5) Stability
Both the Hoka Clifton 9 and Brooks Revel 7 are classified as neutral running shoes, but they approach stability differently. The Clifton 9 features a symmetrical bed of cushion without additional prescriptive technologies. This design philosophy aims to provide support without forcing your foot into a specific position.
The Revel 7, while also neutral, relies on its well-designed midsole and upper to provide stability. The BioMoGo DNA midsole adapts to your gait, offering subtle support where needed. Neither shoe is designed for severe overpronators, but both provide adequate stability for neutral runners or those with mild pronation issues.
6) Value for Money
When considering value for money, we need to look at both the initial cost and long-term benefits. The Hoka Clifton 9, priced at $145, is the more expensive option. However, its advanced cushioning technology, durability, and versatility for various running distances make it a solid investment for serious runners.
The Brooks Revel 7, at $100, offers excellent value for its price point. It provides a comfortable, versatile shoe suitable for both running and casual wear. While it may not have all the premium features of the Clifton 9, it delivers a reliable performance that exceeds its price tag, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious runners or those new to the sport.
Hoka Clifton 9 vs Brooks Revel 7: Performance Testing
1) for Walking
When it comes to walking, both shoes offer comfort, but in different ways. The Hoka Clifton 9 shines with its plush cushioning and early stage Meta-Rocker technology. This feature promotes a smoother heel-to-toe transition, making long walks a breeze. The extra cushioning is particularly noticeable during extended periods on your feet, reducing fatigue and discomfort.
The Brooks Revel 7, while not as cushioned, provides a more grounded feel that some walkers prefer. Its BioMoGo DNA midsole adapts to your stride, offering personalized comfort. The shoe’s lighter weight and more flexible design can make it feel more natural for casual walks. However, for those planning very long walks or those with joint issues, the extra cushioning of the Clifton 9 might be more beneficial.
2) for Running
In the running department, both shoes perform admirably, but cater to different preferences. The Hoka Clifton 9 excels in long-distance running. Its generous cushioning and lightweight design (only 8.7 oz) make it ideal for marathons or extended training sessions. The early stage Meta-Rocker promotes efficient running form, potentially reducing fatigue over long distances.
The Brooks Revel 7, weighing slightly more at 9.1 oz, offers a more traditional running experience. Its responsive cushioning provides a nice balance between comfort and ground feel, making it versatile for various running distances.
It particularly shines in shorter to medium-length runs, where its blend of cushioning and responsiveness can enhance speed workouts. However, for ultra-long distances, some runners might prefer the more protective cushioning of the Clifton 9.
3) for Standing All Day
For those whose jobs or lifestyles require standing for extended periods, cushioning and support become crucial. The Hoka Clifton 9 is a standout in this category. Its thick, soft midsole provides excellent shock absorption and reduces pressure on the feet, ankles, and lower back. The Meta-Rocker geometry can also help reduce fatigue by promoting a more natural standing posture.
The Brooks Revel 7, while comfortable, may not provide the same level of all-day standing comfort as the Clifton 9. However, its adaptive cushioning does offer good support, and some users might prefer its less dramatic cushioning for a more grounded feel.
The choice here largely depends on personal preference and the specific demands of your standing routine. If you’re on hard surfaces all day, the extra cushioning of the Clifton 9 could make a significant difference.
4) for Plantar Fasciitis
For runners dealing with plantar fasciitis, shoe choice can significantly impact comfort and recovery. The Hoka Clifton 9 is often recommended for this condition due to its exceptional cushioning and support. The thick, soft midsole helps absorb impact, reducing stress on the plantar fascia.
The Meta-Rocker technology can also help by promoting a more efficient foot strike and toe-off, potentially alleviating some of the strain on the plantar fascia.
The Brooks Revel 7, while not specifically designed for plantar fasciitis, can still be a good option for some sufferers. Its adaptive cushioning provides decent support, and the flexible design allows for natural foot movement.
However, for severe cases of plantar fasciitis, the more substantial cushioning and support of the Clifton 9 might be more beneficial. As always, it’s best to consult with a podiatrist for personalized advice when dealing with foot conditions.
Conclusion: Which Is Better For You?
Choosing between the Hoka Clifton 9 and Brooks Revel 7 ultimately comes down to your specific needs and preferences. If you prioritize maximum cushioning, especially for long distances or all-day comfort, the Hoka Clifton 9 is your go-to. It’s also a better choice for those with foot conditions requiring extra support.
However, if you prefer a more traditional running feel with good versatility at a lower price point, the Brooks Revel 7 is an excellent option. Consider your running style, comfort needs, and budget to make the best choice for your feet.