Hoka Clifton 9 vs Brooks Glycerin 21: What Should I Buy?

As avid runners and fitness enthusiasts, we’re always on the hunt for the perfect pair of shoes to support our active lifestyles. Two of the top contenders in the running shoe market are the Hoka Clifton 9 and the Brooks Glycerin 21. Both promise exceptional comfort, responsive cushioning, and enhanced performance, but which one reigns supreme?

In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll delve into the features, technology, and real-world testing of these two powerhouses to help you make an informed decision on the best fit for your needs.

Key Takeaways:

  1. Lightweight and Responsive Cushioning: The Hoka Clifton 9 offers a balanced and responsive cushioning system, making it a great option for everyday running and activities.
  2. Plush and Luxurious Comfort: The Brooks Glycerin 21 is renowned for its supreme softness and ultimate comfort, providing a supremely cushioned and supportive ride.
  3. Durable Construction: Both the Clifton 9 and Glycerin 21 feature durable outsoles and midsole technologies that maintain their performance over time.
  4. Versatile Performance: These shoes excel in various scenarios, from walking and standing to running and managing conditions like plantar fasciitis.
  5. Value for Money: While the Glycerin 21 has a slightly higher price tag, both shoes offer exceptional value in their respective categories, catering to different runner preferences.

Comparison Table between Clifton 9 And Glycerin 21:

FeatureHoka Clifton 9Brooks Glycerin 21
Launched In20232022
StabilityNeutralNeutral
FlexibilityModerateModerate
SizingTrue to SizeTrue to Size
Weight8.70 oz9.8 oz
CushionResponsive Balanced PlushSupreme Softness
OutsoleDurabrasion RubberRubber
MidsoleCompression Molded EVA FoamDNA LOFT v3 Cushioning
UpperBreathable Engineered KnitStreamlined Mesh
Retail Price$145$160

Hoka Clifton 9 VS Brooks Glycerin 21: FEATURES COMPARISON

Material

The materials used in the construction of the Hoka Clifton 9 and Brooks Glycerin 21 play a crucial role in their overall performance and durability. The Clifton 9 features a breathable engineered knit upper that provides a lightweight and foot-hugging fit, while the Glycerin 21 boasts a streamlined mesh upper for a structured and breathable feel.

HOKA CLIFTON 9
CLIFTON 9

Brooks Glycerin 21
GLYCERIN 21

Both shoes utilize durable rubber outsoles to ensure long-lasting traction and wear. The Clifton 9’s compression molded EVA foam midsole and the Glycerin 21’s DNA LOFT v3 cushioning are engineered to deliver responsive and cushioned underfoot support, respectively, ensuring a comfortable and high-performing ride for the user.

Durability

The durability of the Hoka Clifton 9 and Brooks Glycerin 21 is a crucial consideration for runners and fitness enthusiasts. The Clifton 9 employs a Durabrasion rubber outsole designed to extend the shoe’s lifespan and provide reliable traction.

Similarly, the Glycerin 21’s rubber outsole promises long-lasting durability. The compression molded EVA foam midsole of the Clifton 9 and the DNA LOFT v3 cushioning of the Glycerin 21 are both engineered to maintain their responsive and cushioning properties over time, ensuring the shoes continue to deliver exceptional performance even after extended use.

Fit

Both the Hoka Clifton 9 and Brooks Glycerin 21 are true to size, offering a comfortable and secure fit for the user. The gusseted tongue of the Clifton 9 helps mitigate tongue migration, providing a snug and customized fit.

HOKA CLIFTON 9 TOP VIEW
CLIFTON 9 TOP VIEW

Brooks Glycerin 21 TOP VIEW
GLYCERIN 21 TOP VIEW

The Glycerin 21, on the other hand, boasts an improved fit that delivers a streamlined and structured feel, ensuring a seamless and supportive experience for the wearer. The true-to-size nature of both shoes allows for a hassle-free selection process, catering to a wide range of foot shapes and sizes.

Cushioning

The cushioning systems employed in the Hoka Clifton 9 and Brooks Glycerin 21 are designed to provide a comfortable and responsive ride. The Clifton 9 features a compression molded EVA foam midsole that is engineered to deliver protective cushion while maintaining a responsive toe-off, thanks to its early-stage Meta-Rocker technology.

In contrast, the Glycerin 21 offers supreme softness and plush cushioning with its DNA LOFT v3 cushioning system, providing a supremely comfortable and luxurious underfoot experience.

Stability

Both the Hoka Clifton 9 and Brooks Glycerin 21 are classified as neutral running shoes, providing a symmetrical bed of cushion without additional prescriptive technologies. The Clifton 9’s balanced cushioning system caters to a wide range of runners, offering a stable and supportive ride.

Similarly, the Glycerin 21’s smooth and stable transitions ensure a confident and controlled stride, making it a suitable option for runners seeking a neutral and well-balanced shoe.

Value for Money

While the Clifton 9 retails for $145 and the Glycerin 21 for $160, both shoes offer exceptional value in their respective categories. The Clifton 9’s lightweight construction and responsive cushioning make it a great option for everyday running, while the Glycerin 21’s supreme softness and ultimate comfort cater to those seeking a plush, luxurious ride.

Hoka Clifton 9 VS Brooks Glycerin 21: Performance Testing

Walking

Both the Clifton 9 and Glycerin 21 excel in the realm of walking. The Clifton 9’s balanced cushioning and smooth heel-to-toe transitions provide a comfortable and efficient stride, while the Glycerin 21’s plush DNA LOFT v3 cushioning offers a supremely soft and supportive underfoot feel, making it an excellent choice for extended walking sessions.

Running

When it comes to running, the Clifton 9’s responsive cushioning and early-stage Meta-Rocker technology deliver a dynamic, energy-returning ride that’s perfect for everyday runs. The Glycerin 21’s DNA LOFT v3 cushioning also provides a soft, floaty sensation that can help runners enjoy and savor their runs.

Standing All Day

For those who spend long hours on their feet, the Clifton 9’s lightweight construction and balanced cushioning can help reduce fatigue and provide all-day comfort. The Glycerin 21’s supreme softness and stable transitions also make it a viable option for extended periods of standing or light activity.

Plantar Fasciitis

Both the Clifton 9 and Glycerin 21 offer features that can benefit those with plantar fasciitis. The Clifton 9’s balanced cushioning and early-stage Meta-Rocker technology help promote a natural, smooth gait pattern, which can alleviate pressure on the plantar fascia. The Glycerin 21’s plush DNA LOFT v3 cushioning also provides ample support and shock absorption to help manage the symptoms of plantar fasciitis.

Conclusion: Which Is Better for You?

In the end, the choice between the Hoka Clifton 9 and the Brooks Glycerin 21 ultimately comes down to your personal preferences and running needs. If you’re seeking a lightweight, responsive, and well-cushioned shoe for everyday runs and activities, the Clifton 9 may be the perfect fit.

On the other hand, if you prioritize supreme softness and ultimate comfort, the Glycerin 21 could be the ideal choice. Both shoes offer exceptional value and performance in their respective categories, making them worthy contenders in the running shoe market.

Leave a Comment