Lace up and get ready for an epic showdown between two titans of the running world! The Hoka Clifton 9 and Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 are battling it out for supremacy on the roads.
Both shoes promise comfort and performance, but which one will cross the finish line first in this head-to-head comparison? Let’s dive in and find out which shoe deserves the top spot on your feet!
Comparison Table between Clifton 9 And Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23:
| Feature | Hoka Clifton 9 | Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 |
|---|---|---|
| Launched In | 2023 | 2023 |
| Stability | Neutral | Supportive |
| Flexibility | Moderate | Moderate |
| Sizing | True to size | True to size |
| Weight | 8.70 oz (246.6g) | 10.1 oz (286.3g) |
| Cushion | Plush | Soft |
| Outsole | Durabrasion rubber | Rubber |
| Midsole | Compression molded EVA foam | DNA LOFT v2 |
| Upper | Engineered knit | Engineered mesh |
| Retail Price | $145.00 | $140.00 |
Hoka Clifton 9 VS Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23: FEATURES COMPARISON
1) Materials
When it comes to materials, both shoes bring their A-game. The Hoka Clifton 9 features a Durabrasion rubber outsole that’s designed to withstand the wear and tear of daily runs.
Its compression molded EVA foam midsole provides a perfect balance of cushioning and responsiveness. The upper is crafted from breathable engineered knit, offering a snug, comfortable fit.
On the other hand, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 boasts a durable rubber outsole that grips the road well. Its midsole uses DNA LOFT v2 technology, which is Brooks’ softest cushioning material. The upper is made of engineered mesh, providing a good balance of breathability and structure.
Both shoes use recycled materials in their construction, with the Clifton 9 using recycled laces and the Adrenaline GTS 23 incorporating 65.9% recycled materials in the upper.
2) Durability
When it comes to longevity, both shoes are built to last. The Hoka Clifton 9’s Durabrasion rubber outsole is specifically designed to extend the shoe’s lifespan, making it a reliable choice for high-mileage runners. The compression molded EVA foam midsole is known for its durability, maintaining its cushioning properties over time.
The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 is no slouch either. Its rubber outsole provides excellent traction and wear resistance. The DNA LOFT v2 midsole is engineered to maintain its cushioning properties throughout the shoe’s lifespan. Both shoes are designed to withstand the rigors of daily training, but the Clifton 9 might have a slight edge in terms of outsole durability.
3) Fit
The fit of a running shoe can make or break your running experience. The Hoka Clifton 9 offers a gusseted tongue that helps prevent tongue migration and provides a secure fit.
Its engineered knit upper is designed to hug the foot comfortably, adapting to different foot shapes. The Clifton 9 is available in regular width, with some sizes offering a wide option.
The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 shines in terms of fit options. It’s available in narrow, medium, wide, and extra wide widths, catering to a broader range of foot shapes.
The engineered mesh upper provides a secure fit while allowing for some stretch and flexibility. Both shoes tend to run true to size, but the Adrenaline GTS 23 offers more width options for those who need them.
4) Cushioning
Cushioning is where both shoes really flex their muscles. The Hoka Clifton 9 is known for its plush cushioning, with an increased stack height compared to its predecessor. The compression molded EVA foam midsole provides a soft, responsive ride that’s designed to be protective while maintaining a responsive toe-off.
The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 features DNA LOFT v2 cushioning, which is described as soft and “floaty-feeling.” It’s designed to provide a smooth ride that helps you enjoy and savor your run. While both shoes offer excellent cushioning, the Clifton 9 might feel slightly more plush due to its higher stack height, while the Adrenaline GTS 23 balances softness with a more traditional feel.
5) Stability
Here’s where we see a significant difference between the two shoes. The Hoka Clifton 9 is a neutral shoe, featuring a symmetrical bed of cushion without additional prescriptive technologies. It’s designed to provide the support you want without any unnecessary extras.
In contrast, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 is a stability shoe, offering what Brooks calls “whole body support.” It’s designed to provide extra support for runners who need it, particularly those who tend to overpronate. The Adrenaline GTS 23 uses Brooks’ GuideRails technology, which helps keep excess movement in check.
6) Value For Money
Both shoes offer excellent value, but in slightly different ways. The Hoka Clifton 9, priced at $145, is a versatile shoe that works well for both everyday runs and longer distances. Its durability and plush cushioning make it a solid investment for runners looking for a comfortable, reliable shoe.
The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23, slightly cheaper at $140, offers great value especially for runners needing stability features. Its wide range of width options and supportive design make it an excellent choice for a variety of foot types and running styles. Both shoes use recycled materials, adding environmental value to your purchase.
Hoka Clifton 9 VS Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23: Performance Testing
1) For Walking
When it comes to walking, both shoes offer comfort and support, but in different ways. The Hoka Clifton 9 shines with its plush cushioning and early stage Meta-Rocker design.
This feature promotes a smoother heel-to-toe transition, which can make walking feel effortless and more comfortable, especially over long distances. The lightweight design (8.70 oz) also contributes to a comfortable walking experience, reducing fatigue during extended walks.
The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23, while slightly heavier (10.1 oz), offers excellent stability for walking. Its GuideRails support system helps keep your feet aligned, which can be particularly beneficial for those who tend to overpronate or have flat feet. The soft DNA LOFT v2 cushioning provides comfort for all-day wear.
For pure walking comfort, the Clifton 9 might have a slight edge due to its lighter weight and rocker design, but the Adrenaline GTS 23 is an excellent choice for those needing more support during their walks.
2) For Running
Both shoes excel in running performance, but they cater to different needs. The Hoka Clifton 9 is designed for neutral runners who enjoy a plush, responsive ride.
Its lightweight design and early stage Meta-Rocker technology promote efficient running mechanics, making it an excellent choice for both daily training and long-distance runs. The generous cushioning helps absorb impact, potentially reducing fatigue during longer runs.
The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23, on the other hand, is tailored for runners who need additional support. Its GuideRails system helps keep excess movement in check, potentially reducing the risk of injuries related to overpronation. The DNA LOFT v2 cushioning provides a soft yet responsive feel, suitable for various running paces.
While slightly heavier than the Clifton 9, it still offers a smooth ride. For neutral runners, the Clifton 9 might be preferred, while those needing stability features will likely appreciate the Adrenaline GTS 23 more.
3) For Standing All Day
When it comes to standing all day, comfort and support are crucial. The Hoka Clifton 9’s plush cushioning and lightweight design make it an excellent choice for those who spend long hours on their feet.
The generous stack height provides ample shock absorption, potentially reducing fatigue in the feet and legs. The breathable engineered knit upper also helps keep feet cool and comfortable throughout the day.
The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 offers a different kind of all-day comfort. Its stability features, including the GuideRails support system, can be particularly beneficial for those who tend to overpronate when standing for long periods. The soft DNA LOFT v2 cushioning provides comfort without feeling overly squishy.
The variety of width options also ensures a better fit for different foot shapes, which is crucial for all-day wear. While both shoes perform well, those needing more stability might prefer the Adrenaline GTS 23, while those prioritizing lightweight cushioning might lean towards the Clifton 9.
4) For Plantar Fasciitis
For runners dealing with plantar fasciitis, both shoes offer features that can help alleviate discomfort. The Hoka Clifton 9’s plush cushioning and early stage Meta-Rocker design can help reduce strain on the plantar fascia by promoting a smoother foot strike and toe-off. The generous cushioning, particularly in the heel area, can help absorb impact and reduce stress on the affected area.
The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 approaches plantar fasciitis relief through stability and support. Its GuideRails system helps maintain proper foot alignment, which can be beneficial in managing plantar fasciitis symptoms. The soft DNA LOFT v2 cushioning provides comfort without sacrificing support.
The Adrenaline GTS 23 also offers more width options, which can be crucial for finding the right fit when dealing with foot pain. While both shoes can be suitable for plantar fasciitis, the choice might come down to whether the individual needs more cushioning (Clifton 9) or more stability (Adrenaline GTS 23).
Conclusion: Which Is Better For You
Choosing between the Hoka Clifton 9 and Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you’re a neutral runner seeking lightweight, plush cushioning for comfortable long-distance runs, the Clifton 9 is your go-to.
However, if you need extra stability and support, particularly if you overpronate, the Adrenaline GTS 23 is the clear winner. Both shoes offer excellent comfort and performance, so consider your running style, foot type, and specific requirements to make the best choice for your feet.