Hoka Clifton 9 VS Asics Gel Cumulus 25: What Should I Buy?

Alright, let’s dive into the world of running shoes and compare two popular models that have been making waves in the running community. The Hoka Clifton 9 and Asics Gel Cumulus 25 are both designed to provide comfort and performance for everyday runners.

But which one comes out on top? Let’s lace up and explore these shoes in detail to help you make the best choice for your feet.

key takeaways:

  1. The Hoka Clifton 9 offers plush cushioning and a lightweight design, making it ideal for long runs and all-day comfort. Its Meta-Rocker technology promotes smooth transitions, which may benefit those with plantar fasciitis.
  2. The Asics Gel Cumulus 25 provides a balance of soft cushioning and responsiveness, thanks to its FF BLAST™ PLUS and PureGEL® technologies. It may be preferred by runners seeking versatility in their training.
  3. Both shoes are neutral runners, but the Clifton 9 has a slightly wider range of sizes and width options, potentially making it more accessible for those with specific fit needs.
  4. The Gel Cumulus 25 incorporates more eco-friendly materials, which may appeal to environmentally conscious runners. It also has a full-ground contact design that could offer a more stable feel.
  5. While both shoes are competitively priced, the final choice between the Clifton 9 and Gel Cumulus 25 will likely depend on individual preferences for cushioning, responsiveness, and overall feel during runs or all-day wear.

Comparison Table between Hoka Clifton 9 And Asics Gel Cumulus 25:

FeatureHoka Clifton 9Asics Gel Cumulus 25
Launched In20232023
StabilityNeutralNeutral
FlexibilityModerateModerate to High
SizingTrue to sizeTrue to size
Weight8.7 oz (247g)8.9 oz (255g)
CushionPlushSoft
OutsoleDurabrasion rubberAHAR® rubber
MidsoleCompression molded EVA foamFF BLAST™ PLUS and PureGEL®
UpperEngineered knitEngineered jacquard mesh
Retail Price$145.00$140.00

Hoka Clifton 9 VS Asics Gel Cumulus 25: Features Comparision

1) Materials

When it comes to materials, both shoes bring their A-game. The Hoka Clifton 9 features a Durabrasion rubber outsole designed for longevity, while the Asics Gel Cumulus 25 employs AHAR® (Asics High Abrasion Rubber) for improved durability.

HOKA CLIFTON 9
CLIFTON 9

ASICS GEL CUMULUS 25
GEL CUMULUS 25

For the midsole, Hoka uses compression molded EVA foam, which is known for its lightweight cushioning. Asics, on the other hand, combines FF BLAST™ PLUS technology with PureGEL® for a balance of impact absorption and energy return.

The upper on the Clifton 9 is a breathable engineered knit, while the Gel Cumulus 25 sports an engineered jacquard mesh. Both uppers aim to provide comfort and breathability, but the knit of the Clifton might edge out in terms of foot-hugging comfort.

2) Durability

Both shoes are built to last, but they approach durability in different ways. The Hoka Clifton 9’s Durabrasion rubber outsole is designed to extend the shoe’s longevity, particularly in high-wear areas. This, combined with the compression molded EVA foam midsole, should provide consistent performance over many miles.

The Asics Gel Cumulus 25, with its AHAR® outsole rubber, is also engineered for durability. The full-ground contact design of the Cumulus 25 may contribute to a more even wear pattern.

However, the softer cushioning of both shoes might compress over time, potentially affecting long-term durability. Overall, both shoes should hold up well for the average runner, but heavy users might notice wear slightly sooner than with firmer models.

3) Fit

Fit is crucial in a running shoe, and both models aim to please. The Hoka Clifton 9 features a gusseted tongue to prevent migration and enhance the overall fit. Its engineered knit upper is designed to provide a snug, foot-hugging comfort that adapts to your foot shape.

HOKA CLIFTON 9 TOP VIEW
CLIFTON 9 TOP VIEW

ASICS GEL CUMULUS 25 TOP VIEW
GEL CUMULUS 25 TOP VIEW

The Asics Gel Cumulus 25, with its engineered jacquard mesh upper, also aims for a comfortable fit with good breathability. Both shoes are reported to fit true to size, which is a plus for consistency.

However, the Clifton 9 offers a wider range of sizes (7-16) compared to the Cumulus 25, which might give it an edge for runners with very large or small feet. The Clifton 9 also comes in wide widths, providing options for runners who need more room in the toe box.

4) Cushioning

Cushioning is where these shoes really shine, albeit in different ways. The Hoka Clifton 9 is known for its plush cushioning, thanks to its thick compression molded EVA foam midsole. It’s designed to provide protective cushion while maintaining a responsive toe-off. The early stage Meta-Rocker technology aims to promote a smoother heel-to-toe transition.

On the other hand, the Asics Gel Cumulus 25 employs a combination of FF BLAST™ PLUS technology and PureGEL® cushioning. This setup is designed to provide soft landings and energized toe-offs. The FF BLAST™ PLUS foam is particularly noteworthy for its lightweight impact absorption and responsive rebound.

While both shoes offer ample cushioning, the Clifton 9 might feel more plush, while the Cumulus 25 could provide a slightly more balanced feel between softness and responsiveness.

5) Stability

Both the Hoka Clifton 9 and Asics Gel Cumulus 25 are categorized as neutral running shoes, meaning they’re designed for runners who don’t need additional support for overpronation.

The Clifton 9 features a symmetrical bed of cushion without additional prescriptive technologies, providing the support you want without extras you don’t need. Its wider base and Meta-Rocker geometry can contribute to a stable ride.

The Gel Cumulus 25, while also neutral, incorporates a full-ground contact design that creates a smoother and potentially more stable ride. Its PureGEL® technology, positioned in the heel, may also contribute to stability during heel strikes. For runners with normal arches or those who slightly underpronate, both shoes should provide adequate stability for everyday runs.

6) Value For Money

When it comes to value for money, both the Hoka Clifton 9 and Asics Gel Cumulus 25 offer competitive options. The Clifton 9, priced at $145, justifies its cost with plush cushioning and potential durability. The Gel Cumulus 25, at $140, provides advanced features like FF BLAST™ PLUS and PureGEL® at a slightly lower price point.

The Cumulus 25 also scores points for using recycled materials, appealing to eco-conscious runners. Ultimately, both shoes deliver solid value, with the final choice depending on individual preferences and needs.

Hoka Clifton 9 VS Asics Gel Cumulus 25: Performance Testing

1) For Walking

When it comes to walking, both shoes offer comfortable experiences, but with slightly different feels. The Hoka Clifton 9, with its plush cushioning and early stage Meta-Rocker technology, provides a smooth and comfortable walking experience.

The rocker geometry can help promote a natural walking gait, potentially reducing fatigue during long walks. Its lightweight design (8.7 oz) is a bonus for all-day comfort.

The Asics Gel Cumulus 25, while slightly heavier (8.9 oz), offers a different kind of comfort. Its FF BLAST™ PLUS cushioning provides soft landings, which can be appreciated during walks. The full-ground contact design of the Cumulus 25 might offer a more stable feel for some walkers.

Both shoes provide ample cushioning for extended periods on your feet, but the Clifton 9 might have a slight edge for those who prefer a more pronounced rocker feel in their walk.

2) For Running

As running shoes, both models shine but cater to slightly different preferences. The Hoka Clifton 9 is designed for everyday runs with its plush cushioning and lightweight design.

The early stage Meta-Rocker promotes smoother heel-to-toe transitions, which can be particularly beneficial during longer runs. Its engineered knit upper provides a snug fit that many runners appreciate.

The Asics Gel Cumulus 25, with its FF BLAST™ PLUS and PureGEL® technologies, offers a balance of soft landings and energized toe-offs. This combination can provide a more responsive feel, which some runners might prefer for tempo runs or faster-paced training. The engineered jacquard mesh upper of the Cumulus 25 offers good breathability for those hot runs.

Both shoes are excellent for neutral runners, but the Clifton 9 might be preferred for those seeking maximum cushioning, while the Cumulus 25 could appeal to runners wanting a slightly more responsive ride.

3) For Standing All Day

For those who spend long hours on their feet, both shoes offer comfort, but in different ways. The Hoka Clifton 9’s generous cushioning and lightweight design make it an excellent choice for all-day wear.

The thick midsole provides ample protection from hard surfaces, potentially reducing fatigue. The Meta-Rocker geometry might also help in promoting a natural standing posture.

The Asics Gel Cumulus 25, while also comfortable, approaches all-day comfort differently. Its FF BLAST™ PLUS cushioning provides soft support, while the PureGEL® technology in the heel could offer additional comfort during long periods of standing. The full-ground contact design of the Cumulus 25 might provide a more stable platform for some users.

Both shoes should perform well for standing all day, but those who prefer a more pronounced cushioned feel might lean towards the Clifton 9, while those who like a balance of cushion and ground feel might prefer the Cumulus 25.

4) For Plantar Fasciitis

When it comes to plantar fasciitis, both shoes offer features that could be beneficial, but they approach the problem differently. The Hoka Clifton 9’s plush cushioning and Meta-Rocker technology can help reduce stress on the plantar fascia by promoting a smoother foot motion.

The ample cushioning, particularly in the heel area, can provide comfort and shock absorption, potentially alleviating pain associated with plantar fasciitis.

The Asics Gel Cumulus 25, with its PureGEL® technology in the heel, offers targeted cushioning that could be beneficial for heel pain. The FF BLAST™ PLUS midsole provides overall soft landings, which might help reduce stress on the plantar fascia.

Both shoes offer good arch support, which is crucial for managing plantar fasciitis. While both could be suitable choices, individuals with plantar fasciitis might find the more pronounced cushioning of the Clifton 9 more immediately comfortable, but it’s always best to consult with a podiatrist for personalized advice.

Conclusion: Which Is Better For You

Choosing between the Hoka Clifton 9 and Asics Gel Cumulus 25 ultimately comes down to personal preference and specific needs. If you prioritize maximum cushioning and a lightweight feel, the Clifton 9 might be your go-to. Its plush ride and Meta-Rocker technology make it ideal for long, easy runs and all-day comfort.

On the other hand, if you’re looking for a balance of soft cushioning and responsiveness, the Gel Cumulus 25 could be the better choice. Its blend of technologies offers versatility for various running paces. Both shoes are excellent options for neutral runners, but try them on if possible to see which feels best for your feet.

Leave a Comment