Lace up, runners! We’re diving into the world of plush comfort and responsive performance with a head-to-head comparison of two Hoka favorites: the Clifton 8 and Clifton 9.
These siblings in the Clifton lineage have both made waves in the running community, but which one will cross the finish line first in our showdown?
Whether you’re a seasoned marathoner or a casual jogger, this guide will help you navigate the subtle yet significant differences between these two cushioned champions.
Key takeaways:
- Both the Hoka Clifton 8 and Clifton 9 offer excellent cushioning, but the Clifton 9 introduces a new CMEVA foam midsole for improved energy return and responsiveness. This update might appeal to runners looking for a more dynamic ride without sacrificing comfort.
- The Clifton 8 is known for its plush, cloud-like cushioning, making it ideal for those who prioritize maximum softness and impact absorption. The Clifton 9, while still well-cushioned, offers a slightly firmer and more responsive feel.
- Both models feature Hoka’s signature wide base and Meta-Rocker technology, promoting stability and smooth transitions. These features make both shoes suitable for a variety of running styles and distances.
- While both shoes perform well for walking and standing all day, the Clifton 9’s more resilient midsole might provide better long-term support and feel fresher after extended wear. This could make it a preferred choice for those spending long hours on their feet.
- The choice between the Clifton 8 and 9 ultimately comes down to personal preference. Runners who love the classic, super-soft Hoka feel might prefer the Clifton 8, while those seeking a balance of cushioning and responsiveness might lean towards the Clifton 9.
Comparison Table between Clifton 8 And Clifton 9:
| Feature | Hoka Clifton 8 | Hoka Clifton 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Launched In | 2021 | 2023 |
| Stability | Neutral | Neutral |
| Flexibility | Moderate | Moderate |
| Sizing | US 4-15 (M), US 5-12 (W) | US 4-15 (M), US 5-12 (W) |
| Weight | 7.8 oz (M), 6.9 oz (W) | 7.8 oz (M), 6.9 oz (W) |
| Cushion | High | Balanced |
| Outsole | Rubber | Rubber |
| Midsole | Full-length EVA foam | CMEVA foam |
| Upper | Engineered mesh | Engineered mesh |
| Retail Price | $165 | $145 |
Hoka Clifton 8 Vs Clifton 9: FEATURES COMPARISON
1) MATERIAL: outsole, insole, upper sole
When it comes to materials, both the Clifton 8 and 9 share some similarities, but there are key differences that set them apart. The outsole on both models features durable rubber, providing reliable traction on various surfaces. However, the Clifton 9 may have a slightly refined rubber placement for enhanced durability in high-wear areas.
The insole in both shoes offers a comfortable, cushioned feel, but the Clifton 9 might have a more updated design to complement its new midsole foam. The upper on both models uses engineered mesh, which provides breathability and a snug fit. The Clifton 9’s mesh might be slightly more refined, potentially offering better ventilation and a more adaptive fit.
The most significant difference lies in the midsole. The Clifton 8 uses full-length EVA foam, while the Clifton 9 introduces CMEVA foam. This new foam compound in the Clifton 9 aims to provide improved energy return and responsiveness, potentially giving it an edge in performance.
2) Durability
Durability is a crucial factor for any running shoe, and both the Clifton 8 and 9 have been designed with longevity in mind. The Clifton 8 has proven its durability over time, with many runners reporting that it holds up well even after hundreds of miles. Its full-length EVA foam midsole maintains its cushioning properties for extended periods, and the rubber outsole resists wear effectively.
The Clifton 9, being a newer model, incorporates some updates that may enhance its durability. The CMEVA foam midsole is designed to be more resilient, potentially maintaining its cushioning and responsiveness for longer. Additionally, any refinements in the outsole rubber placement could contribute to improved longevity in high-wear areas.
However, it’s important to note that durability can vary depending on individual running style, body weight, and the surfaces you run on. Both models should provide good durability for most runners, but long-term performance of the Clifton 9 is still being assessed by the running community.
3) Fit
The fit of a running shoe can make or break your running experience, and both the Clifton 8 and 9 aim to provide a comfortable, secure fit. The Clifton 8 is known for its accommodating fit, with a roomy toe box that allows for natural toe splay. Its engineered mesh upper adapts well to different foot shapes, providing a snug yet comfortable fit.
The Clifton 9 builds on this foundation, potentially offering some refinements in the fit. The updated engineered mesh upper might provide a more adaptive fit, conforming to the foot’s shape more precisely. Some runners report that the Clifton 9 feels slightly more secure in the midfoot area, which could be beneficial for those who found the Clifton 8 a bit loose.
Both models maintain Hoka’s signature wide base, which contributes to stability and accommodates a variety of foot widths. However, as with any running shoe, individual foot shapes and preferences play a significant role in determining the perfect fit. It’s always recommended to try on both models if possible to determine which provides the best fit for your unique feet.
4) Cushioning
Cushioning is where Hoka truly shines, and both the Clifton 8 and 9 excel in this department. The Clifton 8 is renowned for its plush, cloud-like cushioning provided by the full-length EVA foam midsole. This soft, responsive cushioning has made it a favorite among runners who prioritize comfort, especially for long distances or recovery runs.
The Clifton 9 takes this cushioning to the next level with its new CMEVA foam midsole. This updated foam compound is designed to offer improved energy return while maintaining the signature Hoka cushioning. As a result, the Clifton 9 might feel slightly more responsive and bouncy compared to its predecessor.
Both models feature Hoka’s Meta-Rocker technology, which promotes a smooth heel-to-toe transition. This, combined with the ample cushioning, creates a ride that feels both comfortable and efficient. The 5mm drop in both shoes also contributes to a natural running feel.
While both shoes offer exceptional cushioning, runners who prefer a softer, more pillowy feel might lean towards the Clifton 8. Those seeking a balance of plush comfort and energetic responsiveness might find the Clifton 9 more to their liking.
5) Stability
Despite being classified as neutral running shoes, both the Clifton 8 and 9 offer a good degree of stability. This stability comes from their wide base design, which provides a solid foundation for each foot strike. The Clifton 8 has been praised for its stable ride, particularly impressive given its high level of cushioning.
The Clifton 9 maintains this stability and might even improve upon it slightly. The new CMEVA foam midsole could potentially offer a more stable platform, as it’s designed to be more resilient and responsive. Some runners report that the Clifton 9 feels a touch more controlled during quick direction changes or when picking up the pace.
Both models feature a heel counter that helps lock the foot in place, preventing excessive movement within the shoe. The Meta-Rocker geometry in both shoes also contributes to stability by promoting a natural and efficient gait cycle.
It’s important to note that while these shoes offer good stability for neutral runners, they may not provide enough support for severe overpronators or those needing motion control shoes. As always, runners with specific stability needs should consult with a running specialist.
6) Value For Money
When it comes to value for money, both the Clifton 8 and 9 are strong contenders in the premium running shoe market. With a retail price ranging from $145 to $165, they sit in the mid-to-high range for daily trainers. The Clifton 8 has already proven its worth, with many runners praising its durability and versatility, making it a shoe that can handle everything from easy recovery runs to long distances.
The Clifton 9, is slightly cheaper and brings some technological updates to the table. The new CMEVA foam midsole could potentially offer improved performance and durability, which might translate to better long-term value. However, its true value is still being assessed as runners put more miles on these shoes.
Both models offer the signature Hoka cushioning and comfort, which many runners find justifies the price tag. They’re versatile enough to serve as daily trainers, making them a good investment for those who want one shoe to handle most of their running needs.
Ultimately, the better value depends on individual preferences. If you prioritize a proven track record and don’t need the latest technology, the Clifton 8 might offer better value. If you’re excited about the potential performance improvements of the new midsole and looking for a $20 cheaper model, the Clifton 9 could be worth the investment.
Hoka Clifton 8 Vs Clifton 9: Performance Testing
1) Hoka Clifton 8 Vs Clifton 9 For Walking
When it comes to walking, both the Clifton 8 and 9 shine bright. The Clifton 8, with its full-length EVA foam midsole, offers a plush, cushioned experience that many walkers adore. It’s like strolling on clouds, making it an excellent choice for those long shopping trips or leisurely walks in the park. The wide base provides stability, which is particularly appreciated during extended periods on your feet.
The Clifton 9, however, brings a slightly different flavor to the walking experience. Its CMEVA foam midsole aims to provide a more responsive feel. This could translate to a bit more ‘pep in your step’ during walks, potentially reducing fatigue over long distances. Some users report that the Clifton 9 feels a touch more supportive during prolonged walking sessions, which could be beneficial for those who spend a lot of time on their feet.
Both models feature Hoka’s Meta-Rocker technology, which promotes a smooth heel-to-toe transition. This can make walking feel more effortless and natural in both shoes. Ultimately, for walking, the choice between the Clifton 8 and 9 might come down to whether you prefer a softer, more cushioned feel (Clifton 8) or a slightly more responsive, potentially more supportive experience (Clifton 9).
2) Hoka Clifton 8 Vs Clifton 9 For Running
When we lace up for a run, both the Clifton 8 and 9 prove why they’re favorites in the Hoka lineup. The Clifton 8, with its full-length EVA foam midsole, offers a soft, cushioned ride that many runners love for easy days and long runs. It’s forgiving on the joints, making it a go-to for recovery runs or when you’re logging serious mileage. The Meta-Rocker geometry helps promote a smooth, efficient stride, which becomes particularly appreciated as the miles add up.
The Clifton 9 takes the running experience up a notch with its CMEVA foam midsole. This new foam compound aims to provide improved energy return, which translates to a more responsive feel during your runs. Some runners report that the Clifton 9 feels a bit more ‘alive’ underfoot, especially when picking up the pace. This could make it a more versatile option, comfortable for both easy runs and tempo workouts.
Both shoes maintain Hoka’s signature cushioning, which helps absorb impact and reduce fatigue during longer runs. The engineered mesh upper on both models provides breathability and a secure fit, crucial for comfort during extended running sessions. While both are excellent for running, the Clifton 8 might edge ahead for those prioritizing maximum cushioning, while the Clifton 9 could be the choice for runners seeking a balance of cushioning and responsiveness.
3) Hoka Clifton 8 Vs Clifton 9 For Standing All Day
For those whose jobs or lifestyles require long hours on their feet, both the Clifton 8 and 9 offer excellent support. The Clifton 8, with its plush full-length EVA foam midsole, provides all-day comfort that many users rave about. It’s like having a soft, supportive mattress for your feet. The generous cushioning helps distribute pressure evenly, reducing fatigue and discomfort even after hours of standing.
The Clifton 9 brings a slightly different approach to all-day comfort. Its CMEVA foam midsole is designed to be more resilient and responsive. This could potentially translate to better support and less compression over long periods of standing. Some users report that the Clifton 9 feels a bit more ‘fresh’ underfoot even after extended wear, which could be a boon for those on their feet all day.
Both models feature a wide base design, which enhances stability – a crucial factor when standing for long periods. The Meta-Rocker geometry in both shoes can also help promote a natural standing posture, potentially reducing strain on the feet and lower legs.
While both are excellent choices for all-day wear, those who prefer a softer, more cushioned feel might lean towards the Clifton 8. On the other hand, if you’re looking for a balance of cushioning and support that might feel a bit more ‘energized’ throughout the day, the Clifton 9 could be your best bet.
4) Hoka Clifton 8 Vs Clifton 9 For Plantar Fasciitis
For runners dealing with plantar fasciitis, finding the right shoe can be a game-changer, and both the Clifton 8 and 9 have features that can help. The Clifton 8, with its generous full-length EVA foam cushioning, offers excellent shock absorption and pressure distribution. This can help reduce strain on the plantar fascia, providing relief for many sufferers. The shoe’s Meta-Rocker geometry also promotes a smooth heel-to-toe transition, which can help reduce stress on the plantar fascia during the push-off phase of your stride.
The Clifton 9 builds on these beneficial features with its CMEVA foam midsole. This new foam compound is designed to be more responsive and resilient, which could potentially offer better long-term support for those with plantar fasciitis. Some users report that the Clifton 9 feels a bit more supportive in the arch area, which can be particularly beneficial for managing plantar fasciitis symptoms.
Both models provide a neutral platform with moderate arch support, which is often recommended for plantar fasciitis sufferers. The wide base design in both shoes also contributes to overall stability, which can help reduce unnecessary stress on the feet.
While both shoes can be beneficial for those with plantar fasciitis, individual experiences may vary. The Clifton 8 might be preferred by those seeking maximum cushioning, while the Clifton 9 could be the choice for those who want a balance of cushioning and responsiveness. As always, it’s recommended to consult with a podiatrist or running specialist when dealing with plantar fasciitis.
Conclusion: Which Is Better For You
After our deep dive into the Hoka Clifton 8 and Clifton 9, it’s clear that both shoes have their strengths. The Clifton 8 remains a solid choice for runners who prioritize maximum cushioning and a proven track record. Its plush ride and versatility make it a great all-rounder. The Clifton 9, with its new CMEVA foam, offers a more responsive feel while maintaining the Clifton line’s signature comfort. It might appeal to those looking for a bit more energy return in their runs.
Ultimately, the “better” shoe depends on your personal preferences and running style. If you crave that classic, super-soft Hoka feel, stick with the 8. If you’re curious about a more responsive ride without sacrificing comfort, give the 9 a try. Remember, the best shoe is the one that feels right on your feet, so if possible, try both before making your decision.