Lace up, runners! We’re diving into a head-to-head showdown between two heavyweight contenders in the world of cushioned running shoes: the Hoka Bondi 8 and the Brooks Glycerin 21.
Both promise cloud-like comfort, but which one will have you floating on air? Whether you’re a seasoned marathoner or a casual jogger, this comparison will help you find your perfect sole mate. Let’s hit the ground running!
key takeaways:
- The Hoka Bondi 8 offers maximum cushioning with a higher stack height and wider base,
making it ideal for long-distance runs and all-day comfort. It’s slightly heavier but
provides excellent stability and impact absorption. - The Brooks Glycerin 21 focuses on supreme softness with its DNA LOFT v3 cushioning,
offering a plush, adaptive fit. It’s lighter than the Bondi 8 and provides a more
traditional, closer-to-the-ground feel. - Both shoes prioritize sustainability, with the Bondi 8 being vegan and the Glycerin 21
using 59.7% recycled materials in its upper. They’re comparably priced, with the Bondi 8
at $165 and the Glycerin 21 at $160. - For specific needs like plantar fasciitis, the Bondi 8’s structured support and rocker
design might have a slight edge, while the Glycerin 21’s soft, consistent support
throughout the foot can also provide relief. - The choice between the two ultimately depends on individual preferences: opt for the
Bondi 8 for maximum cushioning and stability, or the Glycerin 21 for a softer, more
traditional running shoe feel with slightly less weight.
Comparison Table between Hoka Bondi 8 And Brooks Glycerin 21:
| Feature | Hoka Bondi 8 | Brooks Glycerin 21 |
|---|---|---|
| Stability | Neutral to Moderate | Neutral |
| Flexibility | Moderate | Moderate to High |
| Sizing | True to size | True to size |
| Weight | 10.80 oz (306 g) | 9.8 oz (277.8 g) |
| Cushion | Plush, Higher bed of soft cushion | Supreme softness, DNA LOFT v3 |
| Outsole | Durabrasion rubber | Rubber |
| Midsole | Lightweight, resilient foam | DNA LOFT v3 |
| Upper | Engineered mesh | Engineered mesh |
| Retail Price | $165 | $160 |
Hoka Bondi 8 VS Brooks Glycerin 21: Features Comparison
1. Materials: outsole, insole, upper sole
The Hoka Bondi 8 boasts a Durabrasion rubber outsole for durability and traction. Its insole features an Ortholite® hybrid sockliner for added comfort, while the upper is constructed with engineered mesh containing 50% recycled polyester.
The Brooks Glycerin 21, on the other hand, uses a sturdy rubber outsole, a plush insole, and an upper made with 59.7% recycled materials. Both shoes prioritize sustainability, with the Bondi 8 being vegan and the Glycerin 21 diverting 4.10 plastic bottles from landfills per pair. The materials in both shoes aim to provide a balance of breathability, durability, and eco-friendliness.
2. Durability
When it comes to longevity, both shoes are built to go the distance. The Hoka Bondi 8’s Durabrasion rubber outsole is designed for extended wear, particularly in high-impact areas. Its zonal rubber placement not only saves weight but also enhances durability where it’s needed most.
The Brooks Glycerin 21, while not explicitly advertising its durability features, uses high-quality materials that are known for their longevity. The rubber outsole and DNA LOFT v3 midsole are engineered to withstand many miles of running. However, the Bondi 8’s more extensive rubber coverage might give it a slight edge in overall durability, especially for heel strikers.
3. Fit
The Hoka Bondi 8 offers a partially gusseted tongue and a memory foam collar that cradles the ankle in plush comfort. Its engineered mesh upper provides a secure yet breathable fit. The Brooks Glycerin 21 boasts an improved fit with its new, more streamlined upper that delivers structure and breathability.
Both shoes are true to size, but the Bondi 8’s wider platform might provide a more stable feel for those with wider feet. The Glycerin 21’s focus on supreme softness extends to its fit, potentially offering a more adaptive, sock-like feel. Ultimately, the best fit will depend on individual foot shape and preference for snugness versus roominess.
4. Cushioning
Cushioning is where both shoes truly shine, but with different approaches. The Hoka Bondi 8 features a higher bed of soft cushion designed to provide a forgiving impact and ride. Its ultralight resilient foam delivers a perfect blend of soft and bouncy feel.
The Brooks Glycerin 21 counters with its DNA LOFT v3 cushioning, offering supreme softness and a “smooth and floaty-feeling run.” The Glycerin 21 is designed for those seeking ultimate comfort, while the Bondi 8 aims to balance plushness with responsiveness.
The choice here might come down to whether you prefer a more substantial, elevated feel (Bondi 8) or a lower-to-the-ground, ultra-soft experience (Glycerin 21).
5. Stability
Despite both being categorized as neutral shoes, they approach stability differently. The Hoka Bondi 8 features a symmetrical bed of cushion without additional prescriptive technologies, designed to provide support without being overly controlling. Its wider platform and extended heel contribute to inherent stability.
The Brooks Glycerin 21 focuses on smooth, stable transitions rather than overt stability features. It’s worth noting that Brooks offers a Glycerin GTS 21 version for those needing more support. For neutral runners, both shoes provide adequate stability, with the Bondi 8 potentially offering a slight edge due to its broader base and structured design.
6. Value for Money
At $165, the Hoka Bondi 8 is slightly pricier than the Brooks Glycerin 21 at $160. The Bondi 8 justifies its cost with extensive cushioning, durable construction, and eco-friendly materials, including its vegan status and use of recycled materials.
The Glycerin 21 offers comparable value with its supreme softness, improved fit, and similar commitment to sustainability. Both shoes are investments in comfort and performance, but the Bondi 8 might edge out in value for those seeking maximum cushioning and durability.
However, the Glycerin 21’s slightly lower price point and focus on ultimate comfort make it a strong contender, especially for those prioritizing a soft, plush feel.
Performance Testing
1. For Walking
For walking, both shoes excel in comfort, but with different feels. The Hoka Bondi 8’s higher stack height and extended heel provide a unique “rocking chair” effect that can make long walks feel effortless. Its plush cushioning absorbs impact well, making it ideal for all-day comfort.
The Brooks Glycerin 21, with its DNA LOFT v3 cushioning, offers a more traditional but extremely soft walking experience. It might feel more natural for those used to conventional sneakers.
For long walks or standing, the Bondi 8’s extra cushioning might have a slight advantage, but the Glycerin 21’s supreme softness ensures it’s no slouch in the comfort department.
2. For Running
When it comes to running, personal preference plays a big role. The Hoka Bondi 8, with its lightweight, resilient foam and rear crash pad, provides a balanced ride from heel-strike to forefoot transition. It excels in long, slow runs where maximum cushioning is appreciated.
The Brooks Glycerin 21 offers a “smooth and floaty-feeling run” thanks to its plush cushioning. It’s designed to help you enjoy and savor your run, making it great for recovery days or easy-paced runs. For speed work, the Glycerin 21 might have a slight edge due to its lighter weight, but for long, cushioned miles, the Bondi 8 is hard to beat.
3. For Standing All Day
For those who spend long hours on their feet, both shoes offer excellent comfort, but with different approaches. The Hoka Bondi 8’s higher bed of soft cushion and Ortholite® hybrid sockliner provide substantial support that can help reduce fatigue during long standing sessions. Its wider base also contributes to stability.
The Brooks Glycerin 21’s supreme softness and improved fit create a plush environment for all-day wear. Its lower profile might appeal to those who prefer a more grounded feel. While both are excellent choices, the Bondi 8’s extra cushioning and stability features might give it a slight advantage for extended periods of standing.
4. For Plantar Fasciitis
Both shoes offer features that can benefit those with plantar fasciitis, but they approach relief differently. The Hoka Bondi 8’s substantial cushioning, especially in the heel area, can help reduce strain on the plantar fascia. Its Meta-Rocker geometry promotes a smoother toe-off, potentially easing pressure on the affected area.
The Brooks Glycerin 21’s DNA LOFT v3 cushioning provides soft, consistent support throughout the foot, which can be beneficial for plantar fasciitis sufferers.
Its emphasis on smooth transitions may also help. While both can offer relief, the Bondi 8’s more structured support and rocker design might provide more targeted comfort for some plantar fasciitis sufferers.
Conclusion: Which Is Better For You
Choosing between the Hoka Bondi 8 and Brooks Glycerin 21 ultimately comes down to your specific needs and preferences. If you crave maximum cushioning, stability, and don’t mind a slightly heavier shoe, the Bondi 8 is your go-to. It’s ideal for long distances, recovery runs, and all-day comfort.
If you prioritize a softer, more traditional feel with a lighter weight, the Glycerin 21 won’t disappoint. It excels in providing a plush, adaptive fit for various running speeds.
Both offer excellent comfort and performance, so you can’t go wrong with either choice. Consider trying both to find your perfect match!