Runners know the importance of finding the perfect pair of shoes that blend comfort, stability, and performance. Enter the Fresh Foam X 860v13 and the Fresh Foam X 1080v13 from New Balance – two models designed to cater to different needs yet share exceptional cushioning.
This comprehensive comparison delves deep into the features, materials, and capabilities of each shoe. Get ready to discover which one aligns better with your running preferences and requirements, propelling your stride to new heights.
Comparison Table between Fresh Foam X 860v13 And 1080v13:
| Features | Fresh Foam X 860v13 | Fresh Foam X 1080v13 |
|---|---|---|
| Launched In | 2023 | 2023 |
| Stability | High (Medial Post) | Neutral |
| Flexibility | Moderate | High |
| Sizing | Fits As Expected | Fits As Expected |
| Weight | 309 grams (10.9 oz) | 262 grams (9.2 oz) |
| Cushion | Fresh Foam X | Fresh Foam X |
| Out Sole | Durable Rubber | Ndurance Rubber |
| Mid Sole | Dual-Density | Fresh Foam X |
| Upper Sole | Engineered Mesh | Engineered Mesh |
| Retail Price (price on official site) | $139.99 | $164.99 |
Features Comparison:
1) Material: outsole, insole, upper sole
The Fresh Foam X 860v13 and the Fresh Foam X 1080v13 share some similarities in their materials, but there are a few notable differences. Both shoes feature an engineered mesh upper for breathability and a snug, supportive fit.
However, the 860v13 has a structured and breathable engineered mesh upper, while the 1080v13 boasts a second-skin style mesh upper for an even more secure and contoured fit.
In terms of the outsole, the 860v13 utilizes a durable rubber compound for traction and durability, while the 1080v13 employs Ndurance rubber in high-wear areas, providing enhanced durability and grip.
2) Durability:
When it comes to durability, both shoes are designed to withstand the rigors of regular training and running.
The Fresh Foam X 860v13 features a dual-density midsole, which combines two different foam densities for an optimal balance of cushioning and support. This configuration helps distribute impact forces more evenly, potentially extending the shoe’s lifespan.
On the other hand, the Fresh Foam X 1080v13 relies on its Ndurance rubber outsole in high-wear areas, offering increased durability and resistance to abrasion. The upper materials on both shoes are engineered to be breathable and supportive, contributing to their overall longevity.
3) Fit:
Achieving the right fit is crucial for a comfortable and efficient running experience. The Fresh Foam X 860v13 features an internal gusseted tongue that helps secure the foot in place, preventing unwanted movement and ensuring a snug, locked-in feel.
The Fresh Foam X 1080v13, with its second-skin style mesh upper, provides a close-to-foot fit that hugs the contours of your foot, ensuring a supportive and structured feel.
4) Cushioning:
Both shoes boast New Balance’s signature Fresh Foam X midsole foam, which is designed to deliver exceptional cushioning and comfort. This midsole foam is crafted with approximately 3% bio-based content derived from renewable resources, reducing the carbon footprint.
While the 860v13 features a dual-density midsole for targeted support and cushioning, the 1080v13 relies solely on the Fresh Foam X midsole for its cushioning capabilities.
5) Stability:
Stability is a key consideration for runners who overpronate or require additional support during their stride. The Fresh Foam X 860v13 is designed with a medial post that helps control pronation, providing essential stability for those who need it.
In contrast, the Fresh Foam X 1080v13 is a neutral cushioning shoe, meaning it doesn’t have any specific stability features. It’s better suited for runners with a neutral gait or those who don’t require additional support.
6) Value For Money:
When it comes to value for money, both shoes offer excellent features and technologies, but at different price points. The Fresh Foam X 860v13 is priced at $139.99, making it a more budget-friendly option for those seeking stability and cushioning.
On the other hand, the Fresh Foam X 1080v13 comes with a higher price tag of $164.99, reflecting its premium cushioning and performance-oriented design. The choice between the two will depend on your specific needs and budget.
Performance Comparison:
1) For Walking:
Both shoes offer excellent cushioning for walks. However, the 860v13’s medial post provides extra stability for those with flat feet or overpronation, while the 1080v13’s neutral design may suit those without stability needs better.
2) For Running:
The 860v13 excels for runners seeking stability, with its medial post and dual-density midsole guiding the stride and preventing excessive inward rolling. The 1080v13 shines as a neutral cushioning shoe for efficient gaits and long-distance runs, providing exceptional cushioning.
3) For Standing All Day:
For prolonged standing, the 860v13’s dual-density midsole and medial post offer better support and stability, potentially reducing fatigue. The 1080v13’s plush cushioning may not provide the same level of support for extended periods on your feet.
4) For Plantar Fasciitis:
Those with plantar fasciitis may find relief in the 860v13’s medial post and enhanced arch support, alleviating strain on the plantar fascia. The 1080v13’s neutral design, while cushioned, may not offer the same level of support for this condition.
Conclusion:
In the battle between the Fresh Foam X 860v13 and the Fresh Foam X 1080v13, there is no clear winner – it ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences.
If you’re a runner seeking stability and support, particularly if you overpronate or have flat feet, the Fresh Foam X 860v13 with its medial post and dual-density midsole might be the better choice.
However, if you have a neutral gait pattern and prioritize plush cushioning and a lightweight feel, the Fresh Foam X 1080v13 could be the perfect companion for your runs. Consider your individual requirements, running style, and any potential issues you might be experiencing before making your decision.