Lace up and get ready for an epic showdown between two titans of the running world! The Hoka Clifton 9 and Asics Gel Kayano 31 are battling it out for your feet’s affection.
Both promise comfort and performance, but which one will cross the finish line first in your heart? Let’s dive into this head-to-head comparison and find out which shoe truly goes the distance.
key takeaways:
- The Hoka Clifton 9 excels in lightweight design and responsiveness, making it ideal for neutral runners and faster-paced workouts. The Asics Gel Kayano 31 offers superior stability and maximum cushioning, better suited for long-distance runs and overpronators.
- Both shoes feature advanced materials and technologies, with the Clifton 9 focusing on lightweight comfort and the Kayano 31 emphasizing adaptive stability and eco-friendly cushioning.
- For all-day standing or walking, the Clifton 9’s lightweight design reduces fatigue, while the Kayano 31’s maximum cushioning and stability features provide superior support for those needing it.
- The Kayano 31 has a slight edge for managing plantar fasciitis due to its comprehensive stability features and targeted cushioning, though both shoes offer benefits for this condition.
- The choice between these shoes ultimately depends on individual needs: the Clifton 9 for those prioritizing lightness and responsiveness, and the Kayano 31 for those requiring extra support and cushioning for longer distances.
Comparison Table between Hoka Clifton 9 And Asics Gel Kayano 31:
| Feature | Hoka Clifton 9 | Asics Gel Kayano 31 |
|---|---|---|
| Launched In | 2023 | 2024 |
| Stability | Neutral | Neutral to Overpronation |
| Flexibility | Moderate | Moderate to High |
| Sizing | True to size | True to size |
| Weight | 8.70 oz (246g) | 10.7 oz (305g) |
| Cushion | Balanced to Plush | Maximum |
| Outsole | Durabrasion rubber | Hybrid ASICSGRIP™ |
| Midsole | Compression molded EVA foam | FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO cushioning |
| Upper | Engineered knit | Engineered mesh |
| Retail Price | $145.00 | $165.00 |
Hoka Clifton 9 VS Asics Gel Kayano 31: Features Comparision
1) Materials:
When it comes to materials, both shoes bring their A-game. The Hoka Clifton 9 features a Durabrasion rubber outsole designed for longevity, while the Asics Gel Kayano 31 boasts a Hybrid ASICSGRIP™ outsole for improved grip. For the midsole, Hoka uses compression molded EVA foam, offering lightweight cushioning.
Asics counters with their FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO cushioning, which incorporates about 20% bio-based content for eco-conscious runners. The Clifton 9’s upper is a breathable engineered knit, providing a foot-hugging comfort.
The Kayano 31 opts for an engineered mesh upper to enhance breathability. Both shoes utilize modern materials aimed at maximizing comfort and performance, but Asics edges ahead slightly with its innovative grip technology and eco-friendly midsole.
2) Durability
Durability is crucial for runners looking to get the most mileage out of their investments. The Hoka Clifton 9’s Durabrasion rubber outsole is specifically engineered to extend the shoe’s lifespan, promising many miles of reliable performance.
On the other hand, the Asics Gel Kayano 31’s Hybrid ASICSGRIP™ outsole not only improves grip but also contributes to the shoe’s overall durability. Both models feature high-quality upper materials designed to withstand regular use.
However, the Kayano 31’s slightly more robust construction and advanced outsole technology may give it a slight edge in long-term durability. That said, individual running style and maintenance will play significant roles in how long either shoe lasts.
3) Fit
Finding the perfect fit is essential for comfort and performance. The Hoka Clifton 9 offers a gusseted tongue that helps prevent tongue migration, ensuring a secure fit throughout your run. Its engineered knit upper adapts to your foot shape, providing a snug yet comfortable feel.
The Asics Gel Kayano 31 features a knit heel pull tab for easy on and off, and its engineered mesh upper offers a balance of structure and flexibility. Both shoes are true to size, but the Clifton 9 may feel slightly roomier in the toe box.
The Kayano 31’s design caters more to those needing extra support, particularly runners with low arches or flat feet. Ultimately, the best fit will depend on your individual foot shape and running needs.
4) Cushioning
Cushioning can make or break your running experience. The Hoka Clifton 9 is known for its plush feel, utilizing compression molded EVA foam in the midsole. It’s designed to provide protective cushioning while maintaining a responsive toe-off for when you want to pick up the pace.
The Asics Gel Kayano 31 takes cushioning to the next level with its FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO cushioning and PureGEL™ technology. The Kayano 31 offers maximum cushioning, promising cloud-like comfort for those long-distance runs.
While both shoes provide excellent shock absorption, the Kayano 31 might have a slight advantage for runners seeking the utmost in cushioning, especially for longer distances or those with joint sensitivities.
5) Stability
Stability is where these shoes diverge significantly. The Hoka Clifton 9 is a neutral shoe, featuring a symmetrical bed of cushion without additional prescriptive technologies. It’s designed to provide the support you want without unnecessary additions.
In contrast, the Asics Gel Kayano 31 offers adaptive stability with its 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™. This feature helps create a more balanced stride, making it suitable for both neutral runners and those who overpronate.
The Kayano 31’s design is particularly beneficial for runners with low arches or flat feet, offering more support to prevent excessive inward rolling of the foot. If you need extra stability, the Kayano 31 is the clear winner, while neutral runners might prefer the simplicity of the Clifton 9.
6) Value For Money
When considering value for money, we need to look at both the initial cost and long-term benefits. The Hoka Clifton 9, priced at $145, offers excellent value for a high-performance neutral running shoe. It provides a good balance of cushioning, lightweight design, and durability at a relatively affordable price point.
The Asics Gel Kayano 31, at $165, is slightly more expensive but justifies its price with advanced features like the 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™, PureGEL™ technology, and eco-friendly materials. For runners needing extra stability or maximum cushioning, the Kayano 31’s additional cost might be well worth it.
However, if you’re a neutral runner looking for a reliable, cushioned shoe without breaking the bank, the Clifton 9 offers tremendous value. Your specific needs and running style will determine which shoe provides the best value for you.
Hoka Clifton 9 VS Asics Gel Kayano 31: Performance Testing
1) For Walking
When it comes to walking, both shoes offer comfort, but in different ways. The Hoka Clifton 9’s lightweight design (8.70 oz) makes it a joy for casual strolls or power walks.
Its early stage Meta-Rocker technology promotes a smooth heel-to-toe transition, which can make your walk feel more effortless. The plush cushioning provides excellent shock absorption, reducing fatigue during longer walks.
On the other hand, the Asics Gel Kayano 31, while heavier (10.7 oz), excels in stability and support. Its 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™ can be particularly beneficial for those who tend to overpronate while walking. The maximum cushioning, including the PureGEL™ technology in the rearfoot, offers superior comfort for all-day wear.
If you’re looking for a lightweight option for quicker walks, the Clifton 9 is your go-to. But for those needing more support or planning extended periods on their feet, the Kayano 31 might be the better choice.
2) For Running
In the running department, both shoes shine but cater to different needs. The Hoka Clifton 9 is designed for everyday runs, offering a perfect balance of lightweight construction and ample cushioning.
Its responsive toe-off allows for quicker transitions when you want to increase your pace. The breathable engineered knit upper keeps your feet cool during longer runs.
The Asics Gel Kayano 31, while slightly heavier, is built for distance. Its adaptive stability becomes more apparent during longer runs, helping to maintain proper form as fatigue sets in.
The FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO cushioning provides consistent comfort mile after mile. The Clifton 9 is ideal for neutral runners who prioritize speed and responsiveness, making it great for tempo runs and daily training.
The Kayano 31, however, is the champion for long-distance runs and runners needing extra support. Its stability features and maximum cushioning can help reduce fatigue and potential injuries during marathon training or ultra-distance events.
3) For Standing All Day
For those whose jobs or lifestyles require long periods of standing, comfort is paramount. The Hoka Clifton 9’s lightweight design can help reduce foot fatigue over extended periods. Its plush cushioning provides excellent shock absorption, which can be beneficial when standing on hard surfaces.
The early stage Meta-Rocker can also promote a more natural standing posture. The Asics Gel Kayano 31, while heavier, offers maximum cushioning that can be a game-changer for all-day comfort. Its PureGEL™ technology in the rearfoot is particularly effective at absorbing shock and reducing pressure on the heels.
The Kayano 31’s stability features can also help maintain proper alignment, potentially reducing strain on the feet, ankles, and lower back. For those with neutral feet who prioritize lightness, the Clifton 9 is an excellent choice.
However, if you need extra support or have issues with overpronation, the Kayano 31’s adaptive stability and maximum cushioning make it the superior option for standing all day.
4) For Plantar Fasciitis
When it comes to managing plantar fasciitis, both shoes offer features that can help alleviate symptoms, but they approach the problem differently. The Hoka Clifton 9’s generous cushioning, particularly in the heel area, can help reduce strain on the plantar fascia.
Its Meta-Rocker technology promotes a smoother transition from heel to toe, which can decrease stress on the affected area. The lightweight design also means less overall strain on the feet.
The Asics Gel Kayano 31, however, is specifically designed with foot health in mind. Its 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM™ provides adaptive stability, which can be crucial for those whose plantar fasciitis is exacerbated by overpronation. The PureGEL™ technology in the rearfoot offers targeted cushioning right where plantar fasciitis sufferers need it most.
The Kayano 31’s maximum cushioning and support features make it particularly well-suited for managing this condition. While both shoes can be beneficial, the Kayano 31’s comprehensive approach to foot support gives it a slight edge for those dealing with plantar fasciitis.
Conclusion: Which Is Better For You
Choosing between the Hoka Clifton 9 and Asics Gel Kayano 31 ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you’re a neutral runner seeking a lightweight, responsive shoe for everyday runs and faster-paced workouts, the Clifton 9 is your best bet. However, if you need extra stability, maximum cushioning, or are training for long-distance events, the Kayano 31 takes the lead.
Consider your foot type, running goals, and comfort preferences when making your decision. Both shoes offer excellent quality and performance, ensuring that whichever you choose, your feet will thank you.