Lace up, runners! We’re diving into an epic showdown between two heavyweight contenders in the running shoe world: the Hoka Clifton 9 and the Asics Novablast 4.
Both promise cloud-like comfort and energized rides, but which one will cross the finish line first in your heart? Whether you’re a seasoned marathoner or a casual jogger, this head-to-head comparison will help you find your perfect match. Let’s hit the ground running!
key takeaways:
- The Hoka Clifton 9 offers plush, cloud-like cushioning and a lighter weight, making it ideal for long, comfortable runs and recovery days. It’s the go-to choice for runners who prioritize maximum softness underfoot.
- The Asics Novablast 4 provides a more responsive, bouncy feel with its FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO cushioning and trampoline-inspired outsole. It’s versatile enough to handle various types of runs, from easy jogs to tempo workouts.
- Both shoes offer excellent durability, but the Asics Novablast 4 might have a slight edge with its AHAR® outsole and reinforced upper. The Novablast 4 also incorporates eco-friendly materials, appealing to environmentally conscious runners.
- For all-day comfort and standing, the Hoka Clifton 9’s plush cushioning excels, while the Asics Novablast 4’s responsive feel might keep feet feeling fresher over long periods. Personal preference plays a big role in choosing between the two for extended wear.
- Both shoes can benefit runners with plantar fasciitis, but in different ways. The Clifton 9 offers maximum cushioning and shock absorption, while the Novablast 4 provides responsive support and even pressure distribution. The best choice depends on individual comfort and needs.
Comparison Table between Hoka Clifton 9 And Asics Novablast 4:
| Feature | Hoka Clifton 9 | Asics Novablast 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Launched In | 2023 | 2023 |
| Stability | Neutral | Neutral |
| Flexibility | Moderate | High |
| Sizing | True to size | True to size |
| Weight | 8.7 oz (246g) | 9.2 oz (260g) |
| Cushion | Plush | Maximum |
| Outsole | Durabrasion rubber | AHAR® rubber |
| Midsole | Compression molded EVA foam | FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO |
| Upper | Engineered knit | Engineered woven |
| Retail Price | $145 | $140 |
Hoka Clifton 9 vs Asics Novablast 4: Features Comparision
1) Materials: outsole, insole, upper sole
When it comes to materials, both shoes bring their A-game. The Hoka Clifton 9 features a Durabrasion rubber outsole that’s built to last, giving you grip and durability mile after mile. Its compression molded EVA foam midsole provides that signature Hoka cushioning, while the breathable engineered knit upper hugs your foot like a second skin.
On the other hand, the Asics Novablast 4 steps up with its AHAR® (Asics High Abrasion Rubber) outsole, known for its exceptional durability. The midsole is where things get interesting, with FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO cushioning made from 20% recycled bio-based content. Talk about a springy step with a side of eco-consciousness! The engineered woven upper offers a perfect blend of stretch, ventilation, and durability.
2) Durability
In the durability department, both shoes are built to go the distance. The Hoka Clifton 9’s Durabrasion rubber outsole is designed to take a beating, resisting wear and tear on various surfaces. The EVA foam midsole, while soft, maintains its shape and cushioning properties over time.
The Asics Novablast 4 counters with its AHAR® outsole, a material known for its longevity. The FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO midsole not only provides comfort but also maintains its resilience over many miles.
The engineered woven upper is reinforced in high-wear areas, adding to the shoe’s overall durability. Both shoes are solid choices for runners who put in serious mileage, but the Asics might have a slight edge in long-term durability.
3) Fit
Fit is where personal preference really comes into play. The Hoka Clifton 9 offers a gusseted tongue that helps prevent slippage and provides a secure midfoot wrap. The engineered knit upper adapts to your foot shape, offering a snug yet comfortable fit. It’s available in regular width, with wide options in select sizes.
The Asics Novablast 4 introduces a tongue wing construction and a gusseted tongue wing fit system that work together to improve midfoot fit and reduce tongue movement. The engineered woven upper provides a bit more structure than the Clifton 9, which some runners might prefer. It’s designed to accommodate both neutral runners and those with high arches (underpronators).
4) Cushioning
Cushioning is where both these shoes truly shine, but in slightly different ways. The Hoka Clifton 9 is all about that plush, cloud-like feel. With its compression molded EVA foam midsole and increased stack height compared to its predecessor, it offers a soft, pillowy ride that Hoka fans love. The early stage Meta-Rocker technology helps promote a smooth heel-to-toe transition, adding efficiency to your stride.
The Asics Novablast 4 takes a different approach with its FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO cushioning. This midsole material is designed to provide a responsive, bouncy feel.
It’s soft on landing but gives you an energized push-off, thanks to the trampoline-inspired outsole design. While both shoes offer maximum cushioning, the Novablast 4 might feel a bit more responsive and less marshmallow-like compared to the Clifton 9.
5) Stability
Both the Hoka Clifton 9 and Asics Novablast 4 are classified as neutral running shoes, but they approach stability differently. The Clifton 9 features a symmetrical bed of cushion without additional prescriptive technologies. This design philosophy aims to provide support without forcing your foot into a specific position.
The Novablast 4, while also neutral, offers a bit more inherent stability due to its midsole geometry and outsole design. The trampoline-inspired outsole not only provides bounce but also creates a stable platform. This makes the Novablast 4 a solid choice for neutral runners and even mild underpronators who need a touch more stability without moving into a full support shoe category.
6) Value For Money
When it comes to bang for your buck, both shoes offer compelling arguments. The Hoka Clifton 9, priced at $145, gives you that premium Hoka cushioning experience, durability, and the brand’s signature rocker geometry. It’s a versatile shoe that can handle everything from easy recovery runs to long distances.
The Asics Novablast 4, coming in slightly cheaper at $140, offers innovative cushioning technology, durability, and eco-friendly materials. Its versatility across different types of runs and its energized feel make it an attractive option.
Considering the technical features and performance, both shoes provide good value, but the Novablast 4’s slightly lower price point might give it a small edge in this category.
Hoka Clifton 9 vs Asics Novablast 4: Performance Testing
1) For Walking
When it comes to walking, both shoes offer comfort, but in different flavors. The Hoka Clifton 9 shines with its plush cushioning and early stage Meta-Rocker technology. This combination creates a smooth, almost effortless walking experience, perfect for those long strolls or if you’re on your feet all day. The lightweight design (8.7 oz) means less fatigue over time.
The Asics Novablast 4, while slightly heavier (9.2 oz), brings its own walking charm. The FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO cushioning provides a springy, energized feel with each step. This can be particularly appealing if you like a more responsive walking shoe.
The trampoline-inspired outsole adds an extra bounce to your stride, which some walkers might find invigorating. For pure comfort, the Clifton 9 might have a slight edge, but for an energized walking experience, the Novablast 4 takes the lead.
2) For Running
In the running department, both shoes excel but cater to slightly different preferences. The Hoka Clifton 9 is a dream for those who prioritize cushioning. Its soft, pillowy ride makes it ideal for long, easy runs and recovery days.
The early stage Meta-Rocker promotes efficient running form, helping you maintain pace without extra effort. It’s light enough for tempo runs but truly shines in comfort for those long, slow distances.
The Asics Novablast 4 brings more versatility to the table. Its FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO cushioning provides a balance of softness and responsiveness that adapts well to various paces. The bouncy feel can be a real asset during faster runs or interval training.
The trampoline-inspired outsole adds an extra spring to your step, potentially helping with leg turnover. For runners who want one shoe that can handle easy runs, tempo work, and even some speed sessions, the Novablast 4 might have the edge.
3) For Standing All Day
When it comes to standing all day, comfort is king, and both shoes bring their A-game. The Hoka Clifton 9 excels here with its plush cushioning and lightweight design. The compression molded EVA foam midsole provides consistent comfort throughout the day, helping to reduce fatigue. The early stage Meta-Rocker can also help promote a natural standing posture, potentially reducing strain on your feet and legs.
The Asics Novablast 4 offers a different kind of all-day comfort. Its FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO cushioning provides a more responsive feel, which some people find helps keep their feet and legs feeling fresh over long periods. The engineered woven upper with its tongue wing construction ensures a secure, comfortable fit that won’t pinch or irritate during extended wear.
While both are excellent choices, those who prefer a softer, more cushioned feel might lean towards the Clifton 9, while those who like a bit more energy return might prefer the Novablast 4.
4) For Plantar Fasciitis
For runners dealing with plantar fasciitis, both shoes offer features that can help, but in different ways. The Hoka Clifton 9’s plush cushioning can provide excellent shock absorption, reducing stress on the plantar fascia. The early stage Meta-Rocker promotes a smooth heel-to-toe transition, which can help decrease tension on the plantar fascia during push-off.
The Asics Novablast 4, while also well-cushioned, takes a different approach. Its FF BLAST™ PLUS ECO cushioning provides responsive support that can help distribute pressure evenly across the foot.
The trampoline-inspired outsole design may also help in reducing impact forces. The shoe’s ability to accommodate both neutral runners and underpronators (often associated with high arches, a risk factor for plantar fasciitis) is a plus.
Both shoes can be beneficial, but individual comfort and fit are crucial. The Clifton 9 might edge out for those seeking maximum cushioning, while the Novablast 4 could be preferable for those who need a balance of cushioning and responsiveness.
Conclusion: Which Is Better For You
Choosing between the Hoka Clifton 9 and Asics Novablast 4 boils down to your running style and personal preferences. If you crave plush cushioning and a lighter shoe for long, comfortable miles, the Clifton 9 is your go-to.
But if you want a versatile shoe with a springy, energized feel that can handle various workouts, the Novablast 4 takes the crown. Both offer excellent value, comfort, and performance. Ultimately, the best shoe is the one that feels right on your feet and matches your running goals. Happy running!