Alright, let’s dive into the world of running shoes and compare two popular contenders: the Hoka Clifton 9 and the Brooks Ghost 16. Whether you’re a seasoned runner or just starting your fitness journey, choosing the right shoe can make all the difference.
In this article, we’ll break down the features, performance, and value of these two models to help you decide which one might be your perfect fit. Lace up, and let’s hit the ground running!
key takeaways:
- The Hoka Clifton 9 excels in maximum cushioning and lightweight design, making it ideal for long runs and all-day comfort. It features a unique Meta-Rocker geometry for smooth transitions.
- The Brooks Ghost 16 offers a more traditional feel with versatile performance and a wide range of width options. Its DNA LOFT v2 cushioning provides a soft yet responsive ride.
- Both shoes are neutral running shoes suitable for daily training, but the Clifton 9 might edge out for longer distances while the Ghost 16 could be more versatile across different paces.
- For specific needs like plantar fasciitis or standing all day, both shoes offer benefits, with the Clifton 9’s plush cushioning and the Ghost 16’s fit options catering to different preferences.
- The final choice between the Hoka Clifton 9 and Brooks Ghost 16 depends on individual preferences for cushioning level, fit requirements, and running style. Both offer good value at similar price points.
Comparison Table between Clifton 9 And Ghost 16:
| Feature | Hoka Clifton 9 | Brooks Ghost 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Launched In | 2023 | 2024 |
| Stability | Neutral | Neutral |
| Flexibility | Moderate | Moderate to High |
| Sizing | True to size | True to size |
| Weight | 8.7 oz (247g) | 9.5 oz (269.3g) |
| Cushion | Plush | Soft |
| Outsole | Durabrasion rubber | Rubber |
| Midsole | Compression molded EVA foam | DNA LOFT v2 |
| Upper | Engineered knit | Engineered mesh |
| Retail Price | $145.00 | $140.00 |
Hoka Clifton 9 vs Brooks Ghost 16: FEATURES COMPARISON
1) Materials: outsole, insole, upper sole
When it comes to materials, both the Hoka Clifton 9 and Brooks Ghost 16 bring their A-game. The Clifton 9 features a Durabrasion rubber outsole, designed to provide excellent traction and durability.
Its midsole is crafted from compression molded EVA foam, offering a perfect balance of cushioning and responsiveness. The upper is a breathable engineered knit that hugs the foot comfortably.
On the other hand, the Ghost 16 sports a rubber outsole for reliable grip on various surfaces. Its midsole utilizes Brooks’ proprietary DNA LOFT v2 technology, which promises soft cushioning without sacrificing responsiveness.
The upper is made of engineered mesh, providing a secure fit with ample breathability. Both shoes use recycled materials in their construction, with the Clifton 9 using recycled laces and the Ghost 16 incorporating recycled materials in its upper.
2) Durability
Durability is a key factor for any running shoe, and both models aim to go the distance. The Hoka Clifton 9’s Durabrasion rubber outsole is engineered for longevity, promising to withstand the wear and tear of daily runs. The compression molded EVA foam midsole is known for its resilience, maintaining its cushioning properties over time.
The Brooks Ghost 16 doesn’t fall behind in this department. Its rubber outsole is designed to handle the rigors of road running, while the DNA LOFT v2 midsole is built to maintain its cushioning properties mile after mile.
The engineered mesh upper of the Ghost 16 is also constructed to withstand regular use without losing its shape or support. Both shoes seem to prioritize durability, aiming to be reliable companions for many runs to come.
3) Fit
Getting the right fit is crucial for comfort and performance, and both shoes have their unique approaches. The Hoka Clifton 9 offers a gusseted tongue that helps prevent tongue migration and provides a secure fit.
Its engineered knit upper is designed to deliver a foot-hugging comfort that adapts to your foot shape. The Clifton 9 is available in regular width, with some sizes offering a wide option.
The Brooks Ghost 16 takes fit seriously too, with an enhanced upper that’s engineered to deliver a secure fit. It offers more width options, including narrow (1B), medium (1D), wide (2E), and extra wide (4E), catering to a broader range of foot shapes. Both shoes are true to size, but the Ghost 16’s variety of width options might give it an edge for runners with specific fit needs.
4) Cushioning
When it comes to cushioning, both shoes aim to provide a plush, comfortable ride. The Hoka Clifton 9 is known for its generous cushioning, featuring a thick layer of compression molded EVA foam.
This midsole is engineered to be lightweight yet protective, offering a plush feel without excessive weight. The Clifton 9 also incorporates Hoka’s Early Stage Meta-Rocker technology, designed to promote a smooth heel-to-toe transition.
The Brooks Ghost 16 counters with its DNA LOFT v2 cushioning, which is designed to provide a soft and floaty feeling. This cushioning system aims to balance plushness with responsiveness, allowing for a comfortable ride that doesn’t feel overly mushy.
The Ghost 16 is described as having “smooth transitions,” suggesting a fluid ride from heel strike to toe-off. Both shoes prioritize cushioning, but the Clifton 9 might edge out slightly in terms of overall plushness.
5) Stability
Both the Hoka Clifton 9 and Brooks Ghost 16 are classified as neutral running shoes, meaning they don’t have additional stability features for overpronation. The Clifton 9 provides what Hoka calls a “symmetrical bed of cushion without additional prescriptive technologies.” This design philosophy aims to offer support without forcing the foot into a specific position.
The Ghost 16 similarly offers neutral support, focusing on providing a stable platform through its midsole design rather than adding corrective elements. Both shoes should work well for runners with neutral foot mechanics or those who prefer a shoe without aggressive stability features. However, runners needing more pronounced stability might want to look at other models in each brand’s lineup.
6) Value For Money
When considering value for money, both shoes offer compelling packages at similar price points. The Hoka Clifton 9, priced at $145, brings to the table its reputation for plush cushioning, lightweight design, and durable construction. It’s a versatile shoe that can handle daily training, long runs, and even some faster-paced workouts.
The Brooks Ghost 16, slightly cheaper at $140, offers a well-rounded package with its soft cushioning, smooth ride, and variety of width options. It also boasts sustainability credentials, with recycled materials in the upper and a CarbonNeutral® certification. Both shoes represent good value, but the final decision might come down to personal preferences in feel and fit.
Hoka Clifton 9 vs Brooks Ghost 16: Performance Testing
1) For Walking
When it comes to walking, both shoes offer excellent comfort, but with slightly different feels. The Hoka Clifton 9, with its plush cushioning and Early Stage Meta-Rocker technology, provides a smooth and comfortable walking experience.
The rocker geometry can help promote a natural walking gait, potentially reducing fatigue during long walks. Its lightweight design (8.7 oz) is a bonus for those planning extended walking sessions.
The Brooks Ghost 16, while slightly heavier at 9.5 oz, counters with its soft DNA LOFT v2 cushioning that offers a “floaty” feel. This can translate to a very comfortable walking experience, especially for those who prefer a more traditional shoe feel.
The Ghost 16’s variety of width options might give it an edge for walkers who need a specific fit. Both shoes excel for walking, but the Clifton 9 might have a slight advantage for very long walks due to its lighter weight and rocker design.
2) For Running
For running, both shoes shine but cater to slightly different preferences. The Hoka Clifton 9, true to its lineage, offers a highly cushioned ride that’s ideal for easy to moderate-paced runs.
Its lightweight design and Early Stage Meta-Rocker can contribute to a smooth, efficient stride, potentially helping to reduce fatigue on longer runs. The Clifton 9’s plush cushioning might be particularly appreciated on recovery runs or by runners who prefer maximum impact protection.
The Brooks Ghost 16, with its DNA LOFT v2 cushioning, provides a soft yet responsive ride. It’s designed to offer smooth transitions, which can contribute to an efficient running form.
The Ghost 16 might have a slight edge in versatility, feeling comfortable at various paces from easy runs to tempo efforts. Its wider range of width options could also make it a better choice for runners with specific fit needs.
Both shoes are excellent for daily training, but runners preferring a more traditional feel might lean towards the Ghost 16, while those seeking maximum cushioning might prefer the Clifton 9.
3) For Standing All Day
When it comes to standing all day, both shoes offer features that can help alleviate fatigue, but with different approaches. The Hoka Clifton 9’s generous cushioning and lightweight design can be a boon for those on their feet all day.
The thick EVA midsole provides constant underfoot protection, while the Meta-Rocker geometry might help reduce pressure points during prolonged standing. Its breathable knit upper can also help keep feet comfortable during long periods of wear.
The Brooks Ghost 16, with its soft DNA LOFT v2 cushioning, also promises all-day comfort. Its “floaty” feel could potentially reduce the perceived impact of standing on hard surfaces. The Ghost 16’s variety of width options might give it an edge for those who need a very specific fit for optimal comfort during long standing sessions.
Both shoes are solid choices for all-day wear, but individuals with specific needs (like maximum cushioning or wide feet) might find one model more suitable than the other.
4) For Plantar Fasciitis
For runners dealing with plantar fasciitis, both shoes offer features that could potentially help, although it’s important to note that shoe choice should be made in consultation with a healthcare professional.
The Hoka Clifton 9’s plush cushioning and Meta-Rocker geometry could be beneficial. The thick cushioning helps absorb impact, potentially reducing stress on the plantar fascia, while the rocker design might help promote a smoother foot motion.
The Brooks Ghost 16, with its soft DNA LOFT v2 cushioning, also provides good impact protection that could be helpful for plantar fasciitis sufferers. Its “smooth transitions” feature might contribute to a more comfortable gait cycle. The Ghost 16’s variety of width options could be particularly useful, as proper fit is crucial for managing plantar fasciitis.
Both shoes offer good cushioning and support that might be beneficial, but individual experiences may vary. The Clifton 9 might have a slight edge due to its Meta-Rocker design, but the Ghost 16’s fit options could make it a better choice for some.
Conclusion: Which Is Better For You
Choosing between the Hoka Clifton 9 and Brooks Ghost 16 ultimately comes down to your specific needs and preferences. If you prioritize maximum cushioning and a lightweight feel, the Clifton 9 might be your go-to. Its plush ride and rocker geometry make it ideal for long, easy runs and all-day comfort.
On the other hand, if you prefer a more traditional feel with versatile performance and need specific width options, the Ghost 16 could be your perfect match. Both shoes offer excellent value, comfort, and performance, making either a solid choice for most runners. Consider trying both on if possible to see which feels best for your unique feet and running style.